Table 2.
Multilevel models predicting mindfulness, psychological detachment, and sleep quality
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within‐person level (Level 1) | ||||
| Path a: Workload → fatigue | .56*** (.13) | .50** (.16) | ||
| Path b: Fatigue → mindfulness | −.23*** (.06) | −.26*** (.07) | ||
| Path c: Workload → mindfulness | −.32** (.10) | −.19* (.10) | −.13 (.12) | |
| Path d1: Mindfulness → psychological detachment | .28*** (.06) | .28*** (.07) | ||
| Path d2: Mindfulness→ sleep quality | .24*** (.06) | .28*** (.07) | ||
| Workload → psychological detachment | −.16 (.15) | |||
| Workload → sleep quality | −.41** (.15) | |||
| Fatigue → psychological detachment | .00 (.06) | |||
| Fatigue → sleep quality | .18** (.07) | |||
| Psychological detachment ↔ sleep quality | .05* (.02) | .06* (.02) | ||
| Residual variance mindfulness | .30*** (.03) | .28*** (.03) | .20*** (.02) | |
| Residual variance fatigue | .27*** (.02) | .23*** (.02) | ||
| Residual variance psychological detachment | .37*** (.04) | .36*** (.04) | ||
| Residual variance sleep quality | .46*** (.04) | .44*** (.04) | ||
| Indirect effect: a × b | −.13** (.04) | −.13* (.05) | ||
| Variance explained in mindfulness (R 2) | .01 (.01) | .06* (.03) | .09* (.04) | |
| Variance explained in fatigue (R 2) | .05* (.02) | .04 (.03) | ||
| Variance explained in psychological detachment (R 2) | .05* (.02) | .05* (.02) | ||
| Variance explained in sleep quality (R 2) | .03* (.01) | .05** (.02) | ||
| Between‐person level (Level 2) | ||||
| Mean mindfulness | 3.6*** (0.06) | 3.6*** (0.06) | ||
| Mean psychological detachment | 3.2*** (0.06) | 3.2*** (0.05) | ||
| Mean sleep quality | 3.5*** (0.06) | 3.5*** (0.06) | ||
| Psychological detachment ↔ sleep quality | .24*** (0.04) | .23*** (0.04) | ||
| Variance mindfulness | .44*** (.05) | .44*** (.05) | ||
| Variance psychological detachment | .51*** (.06) | .51*** (.06) | ||
| Variance sleep quality | .45*** (.06) | .46*** (.06) | ||
| Number of persons (average number of days per person) included in analysis | 168 (4.42) | 168 (4.42) | 166 (3.43) | 166 (3.42) |
The models tested here are shown in Figure 2.
***p < .001; **p < .01; *p < .05; †p < .10 (two‐tailed).