Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 4;91(2):261–284. doi: 10.1111/joop.12206

Table 3.

Multilevel mediation models predicting mindfulness

Model 1 Model 2
Within‐person level (Level 1)
Path a1: Psychological detachment → fatigue −.01 (.05)
Path a2: Sleep quality → fatigue −.29*** (.05)
Path b: Fatigue → mindfulness −.18** (.07)
Path c1: Psychological detachment→ mindfulness −.02 (.05) −.02 (.05)
Path c2: Sleep quality→ mindfulness .11** (.04) .06 (.04)
Psychological detachment sleep quality .06** (.02) .06** (.02)
Workload → fatigue .48** (.15)
Workload → mindfulness −.24* (.10) −.16 (.10)
Psychological detachment ↔workload .00 (.01) .00 (.01)
Sleep quality ↔ workload −.01 (.01) −.01 (.01)
Residual variance mindfulness .29*** (.04) .28*** (.03)
Residual variance fatigue .24*** (.02)
Indirect effect 1: a1 × b .00 (.01)
Indirect effect 2: a2 × b .05* (.02)
Variance explained in mindfulness (R 2) .02 (.01) .05 (.03)
Variance explained in fatigue (R 2) .14* (.04)
Between‐person level (Level 2)
Mean mindfulness 3.62*** (0.06) 3.62*** (0.06)
Residual variance mindfulness .48*** (.05) .48*** (.05)
Number of persons (average number of days per person) included in analysis 168 (3.38) 168 (3.38)

Models tested here are shown in Figure 3.

***< .001; **< .01; *< .05; < .10 (two‐tailed).