Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 2;6(1):11. doi: 10.3390/sports6010011

Table 2.

Change in time trial performance of studies included for meta-analysis including timings and methods of cooling.

Author Timing Intervention ∆ Performance (s)
Ross et al., 2011 Precooling Ice −66.0 ± 29.4
Ross et al., 2012 Precooling Ice + T −18.6 ± 28.8
- - Ice + G + T 0.0 ± 1.2
Muñoz et al., 2012 Percooling OR −60.0 ± 81.0
- - EXC −48.0 ± 85.2
- - EXC + OR −63.0 ± 52.2
Stanley et al., 2010 Percooling Ice −33.6 ± 60
Stevens et al., 2013 Percooling Ice −72.0 ± 18.0
Stevens et al., 2015 Precooling Ice 18.0 ± 12.0
- Percooling M −42.0 ± 6.0
Stevens et al., 2017 Percooling M −36.0 ± 6.0
Riera et al., 2014 Combined N + M −49.8 ± 33.6
- - COOL 36 ± 139.8
- - COOL + M −162.6 ± 39.0
- - Ice −121.2 ± 12.6
- - Ice + M −232.8 ± 51.0
Tran Trong et al., 2015 Combined COOL + M −136.2 ± 252.0
- - Ice + M −283.2 ± 232.8
Schulze et al., 2015 Combined Ice −23.4 ± 0.0
- - Ice + T 4.8 ± 6.0

Intervention Methodologies: COOL: cool liquid ingestion; EXC: external cooling via pouring cold water; G: glycerine; Ice: ice slurry ingestion; N: ambient temperature water; M: menthol; OR: oral rehydration; SC: scalp cooling; T: iced towels applied to participants.