Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 10;218(4):1462–1477. doi: 10.1111/nph.15100

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Impact of incorporating (a) geographical variability and (b) thermal acclimatization of temperature sensitivity of photosynthetic capacity on land carbon (C). The (a) Geographical effect was estimated (Eqn (Eqn 8)) as the multi‐model mean change in land C storage (kg C m−2) in (c) the Geog simulation minus change in the Ctrl simulation over the study period (1860–2100). Correspondingly the (a) acclimation effect was estimated as the difference between (d) Geog+Acclim and (c) Geog simulations. Positive (negative) values represent an increase (decrease) in land C storage.