Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 24;35(6):737–744. doi: 10.1111/dme.13609

Table 3.

Comparisons between 2005 and 2015 UK incidence rates for Type 2 diabetes in children aged 0–16 years for whole population and for populations classified by gender and ethnicity

2005 2015 Ratio of 2015/2005
Population No. of cases IR* 95% CI Population No. of cases IR 95% CI IRR 95% CI P value (Z‐test)b
Total 12 495 153 67 0.53 0.41–0.68 13 008 432 94 0.72 0.58–0.88 1.35 0.99–1.84 0.062
Gender
Females 6 098 516 38 0.62 0.44–0.86 6 345 915 62 0.98 0.75–1.25 1.57 1.05–2.35 0.029
Males 6 396 637 29 0.45 0.30–0.65 6 662 517 32 0.48 0.33–0.68 1.06 0.64–1.75 0.822
Ethnicity
White 10 857 143 38 0.35 0.20–0.50 8 366 173 36 0.43 0.30–0.60 1.23 0.78–1.94 0.374
BACBB 333 333 13 3.90 2.10–6.70 533 457 9 1.69 0.77–3.20 0.43 0.18–1.01 0.053
South Asiansa 800 000 10 1.25 0.60–2.40 827 786 26 3.14 2.05–4.60 2.51 1.21–5.21 0.013

IR, incidence rate; IRR, incidence rate ratio (2015 rate/2005 rate).

*Rates are presented per 100 000/year. Ethnicity comparisons were based on England figures only to be comparable with 2005 findings. Rates are presented per 100 000/year.

a

South‐Asian ethnicity includes only the Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic groups to follow those of the 2005 study methodology.

b

P values were computed by using the Z‐test with the log‐ratio of the incidence rates.