Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 14;113(6):1117–1126. doi: 10.1111/add.14158

Table 3.

Logistic regression on the risk of smoking in the first pregnancy trimester (multiple imputation estimates): effects of education, occupational class (ESeC), income support recipiency, subjective economic wellbeing (SEW) and depressive state in the first trimester (the EPDS score).

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P‐value
Level and type of highest education
Tertiary level: university degrees Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Tertiary level: vocational degrees 2.2 (1.2–4.0) 0.007 2.1 (1.2–3.8) 0.013 2.2 (1.2–3.9) 0.011
Secondary level: vocational + general sec. School degree 5.4 (2.8–10.2) < 0.001 4.3 (2.1–8.9) < 0.001 4.4 (2.1–9.0) < 0.001
Secondary level: general sec. school degree 3.5 (1.7–6.9) 0.001 2.8 (1.3–6.0) 0.006 2.9 (1.4–6.1) 0.006
Secondary level: vocational degree 12.3 (6.8–22.1) < 0.001 9.7 (5.1–18.6) < 0.001 9.5 (5.0–18.2) < 0.001
Compulsory schooling only 20.5 (9.8–43.0) < 0.001 14.4 (6.3–33.0) < 0.001 14.4 (6.3–33.2) < 0.001
Occupational class (ESeC)
Salaried class Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Intermediate class 2.3 (1.4–3.6) 0.001 1.2 (0.7–2.0) 0.508 1.2 (0.7–2.0) 0.509
Working class 4.0 (2.8–5.8) < 0.001 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 0.322 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 0.295
Unemployed or no occupation 4.4 (2.6–7.5) < 0.001 1.2 (0.6–2.3) 0.613 1.2 (0.6–2.3) 0.569
Received income support
No Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Yes 2.5 (1.6–4.1) < 0.001 1.9 (1.1–3.2) 0.018 1.8 (1.1–3.1) 0.022
Subjective economic wellbeing (SEW)
Lowest tertile 1.7 (1.2–2.4) 0.003 1.3 (0.9–1.8) 0.178 1.2 (0.8–1.7) 0.334
Middle tertile 1.0 (0.7–1.5) 0.804 1.0 (0.7–1.5) 0.912 1.0 (0.6–1.4) 0.803
Highest tertile Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
EPDS
< 10 Ref. Ref. Ref.
≥10 2.0 (1.4–2.8) < 0.001

Target population: the FinnBrain cohort mothers born 1976 or after (N = 2667); controls (estimates not presented): age, partnership status, type of residential area, parents’ separation, parity, childhood household's reference person's socio‐economic group and the TADS score; model 1: separate models (each adjusted for controls) for education, ESeC class, income support recipiency and SEW; model 2 = education + ESeC class + income support recipiency + SEW + controls; model 3 = Model 2 + EPDS. Data sources: FinnBrain questionnaires, except smoking in first trimester (linked from the Finnish Medical Birth Registry), education, ESeC and childhood household's reference person's socio‐economic group (linked from Statistics Finland's registers). Number of missing values: education 0; ESeC 0; income support recipiency 37; SEW 12; age 0; TADS 161; partnership status 0; parity 0; type residential area 0; parent's separation during childhood 67; childhood household's reference person's socio‐economic group 0; EPDS 111. Logistic regressions were estimated using multiply imputed data for missing values. EPDS = Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; TADS = Trauma and Distress Scale; ESeC = European Socio‐economic Classification.