Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Dec 22;55(1):1–15. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0254)

Table 3.

Mean semantic depth scores (standard deviation) and mean proportions (standard deviations) of paradigmatic, syntagmatic, and error responses as a function of score type, group, and trial

Conceptual Spanish English

T1 T2 T3 All T1 T2 T3 All T1 T2 T3 All
LI Semantic depth .46 .39 .31 .38 .35 .26 .20 .27 .25 .20 .17 .20
(.20) (.15) (.16) (.15) (.16) (.14) (.13) (.13) (.22) (.15) (.13) (.15)
Paradigmatic .24 .16 .10 .17 .16 .09 .06 .10 .12 .07 .05 .08
(.21) (.13) (.09) (.12) (.15) (.11) (.08) (.09) (.17) (.09) (.05) (.09)
Syntagmatic .44 .46 .40 .43 .38 .34 .28 .34 .25 .26 .24 .25
(.19) (.19) (.21) (.17) (.17) (.19) (.19) (.16) (.21) (.21) (.22) (.20)
Error .32 .39 .49 .40 .46 .56 .66 .56 .63 .67 .71 .67
(.23) (.21) (.26) (.21) (.21) (.21) (.22) (.19) (.30) (.24) (.24) (.24)

TD Semantic depth .68 .62 .53 .61 .54 .47 .39 .46 .48 .40 .32 .40
(.19) (.16) (.17) (.15) (.18) (.17) (.16) (.15) (.23) (.22) (.21) (.20)
Paradigmatic .48 .40 .30 .39 .34 .25 .18 .26 .29 .23 .14 .22
(.24) (.20) (.18) (.18) (.20) (.18) (.13) (.15) (.23) (.20) (.16) (.18)
Syntagmatic .40 .44 .46 .44 .40 .43 .41 .41 .37 .35 .34 .35
(.20) (.19) (.22) (.18) (.19) (.20) (.22) (.18) (.22) (.25) (.23) (.22)
Error .11 .16 .24 .17 .26 .31 .41 .33 .34 .42 .52 .43
(.18) (.17) (.23) (.18) (.21) (.21) (.24) (.20) (.28) (.29) (.30) (.27)

Note. LI = children with language impairment. TD = children who are typically developing. T1 = trial 1. T2 = trial 2. T3 = trial 3. All = three trials combined.