Skip to main content
. 2018 May 25;15(5):e1002572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002572

Table 1. Characteristics of the 37 included studies.

First author (date of publication) Population Study type Period of inclusion Number of patients Effect size (95% CI)
Wahrmann et al. (2009) [26] Retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive adult renal transplants selected based on the presence of pretransplant DSAs Cohort 2001–2002 338 2.40 (0.90–6.00) for graft loss
10.10 (3.20–31.00) for rejection
Hönger et al. (2010) [28] Retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive adult renal transplant recipients with low levels of pretransplant DSAs Cohort 1999–2004 64 0.93 (0.25–3.44) for rejection
Sutherland et al. (2011) [50] Retrospective, single-center analysis of pediatric renal transplant recipients without DSAs at the time of transplantation Cohort 2000–2008 35 5.80 (1.40–22.90) for graft loss
Hönger et al. (2011) [51] Retrospective, single-center analysis of adult renal transplant recipients with high levels of DSAs pre transplant; recipients who developed ABMR within 6 months Cohort 1999–2008 71 0.43 (0.17–1.12) for rejection
Smith et al. (2011) [7] Retrospective, single-center analysis of living heart transplant recipients after 1 year of transplantation without DSAs pre transplant Cohort 1995–2004 243 3.02 (1.11–8.23) for graft loss
Kaneku et al. (2012) [52] Retrospective (2-center) analysis of adult liver transplant recipients with liver biopsies showing chronic rejection and DSA analysis at the same time Case-
control
NC 39 3.35 (1.39–8.05) for graft loss
Bartel et al. (2013) [53] Retrospective, single-center analysis of 68 desensitized renal recipients who had been subjected to peritransplant desensitization Cohort 1999–2008 68 10.10 (1.60–64.20) for rejection
Lawrence et al. (2013) [54] Retrospective, single-center study of consecutive renal transplant recipients Cohort 2005–2010 52 8.90 (1.20–65.86) for rejection
Crespo et al. (2013) [55] Retrospective (2-center) analysis of renal transplant patients with pretransplant DSAs Cohort 2006–2011 355 0.83 (0.17–4.14) for graft loss
1.44 (0.23–9.11) for rejection
Loupy et al. (2013) [16] Consecutive adult patients in a retrospective (2-center) analysis; unselected global population with DSA detection before or after renal transplantation Cohort 2004–2010 1,016 4.78 (2.69–8.49) for graft loss
Freitas et al. (2013) [56] Retrospective, single-center analysis of renal transplant recipients selected on the basis of DSA detection during follow-up Cohort 1999–2012 203 3.50 (1.30–9.50) for graft loss
Arnold et al. (2014) [57] Retrospective, single-center analysis of renal transplant recipients without DSAs pre transplant and screened for de novo DSAs Cohort 1997–2007 274 4.81 (1.65–14.03) for graft loss
Smith et al. (2014) [25] Retrospective, single-center analysis of lung transplant recipients with pretransplant DSA detection Cohort 1991–2003 63 6.43 (2.96–13.97) for graft loss
Everly et al. (2014) [58] Retrospective, single-center analysis of primary renal transplant recipients without pretransplant DSA detection Cohort 1999–2006 179 2.48 (1.02–6.04) for graft loss
O’Leary et al. (2015) [24] Retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive patients with 1-year survival post liver transplantation;
one group analyzed pretransplant DSA effects, and another group analyzed the impact of de novo DSAs
Cohort 2000–2009 1,270 1.90 (1.62–3.45) for C1q for graft loss
2.40 (1.82–5.75) for IgG3 for graft loss
Wozniak et al. (2015) [59] Retrospective, single-center analysis of pediatric liver transplant patients who were either nontolerant, tolerant, or stable Cohort NC 50 4.30 (1.10–16.40) for rejection
Khovanova et al. (2015) [60] Retrospective, single-center analysis of HLA-incompatible desensitized renal transplant patients Cohort 2003–2012 80 1.69 (0.41–6.93) for preexisting DSAs for graft loss
2.09 (0.30–14.60) for preexisting and de novo DSAs for graft loss
Sicard et al. (2015) [17] Retrospective analysis of consecutive (2-center) adult renal transplant patients who developed ABMR Cohort 2004–2012 69 2.80 (1.12–6.95) for C3d for graft loss
1.98 (0.95–4.14) for C1q for graft loss
Thammanichanond et al. (2016) [61] Retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with pre–renal transplant DSAs Cohort 2009–2013 48 2.20 (0.61–7.85) for rejection
Comoli et al. (2016) [20] Retrospective analysis of consecutive pediatric recipients; single center; first kidney transplant without any HLA antibodies in sera or at the time of transplantation Cohort 2002–2013 114 6.91 (2.78–17.18) for rejection and C3d
13.54 (4.95–36.99) for rejection and C1q
27.80 (5.61–137.72) for graft loss and C3d
11.09 (2.25–54.64) for graft loss and C1q
Yamamoto et al. (2016) [62] Retrospective analysis of renal transplant patients with de novo DSAs and surveillance biopsies Cohort 2009–2013 43 2.60 (0.12–53.90) for rejection
Calp–Inal et al. (2016) [18] Retrospective analysis; single center; consecutive renal transplant patients: Group 1 without pretransplant DSAs and
Group 2 with a mix of preexisting and de novo DSAs
Cohort 2009–2012 284 4.30 (1.10–16.50) for graft loss
Malheiro et al. (2016) [63] Retrospective, single-center analysis of kidney transplant patients with DSAs pre transplant Cohort 2007–2012 60 16.80 (3.18–88.85) for rejection
Visentin et al. (2016) [64] Retrospective, single-center analysis of lung transplant patients with biopsy (with demonstration of rejection) and serum available Cohort 1999–2014 53 1.65 (0.68–3.97) for graft loss
Kauke et al. (2016) [30] Retrospective, single-center analysis of patients selected based on renal biopsy-proven rejection during graft dysfunction or viremia with polyomavirus BK Cohort 2005–2011 611 3.77 (1.40–10.16) for graft loss
4.52 (1.89–10.37) for rejection
Bamoulid et al. (2016) [65] Retrospective, single-center analysis of renal transplant consecutive patients without DSAs pre transplant Cohort 2007–2014 59 2.27 (1.05–4.91) for rejection
6.78 (0.86–53.50) for graft loss
Fichtner et al. (2016) [21] Retrospective, single-center analysis of prospectively screened renal transplant pediatric patients, non-presensitized Cohort 1999–2010 62 6.35 (1.33–30.40) for graft loss
Guidicelli et al. (2016) [19] Retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive nonsensitized kidney transplant patients Cohort 1998–2005 346 2.99 (0.94–10.27) for graft loss
Lefaucheur et al. (2016) [48] Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (2-center); renal transplant patients were unselected Cohort 2008–2010 125 4.80 (1.70–13.30) for IgG3 for graft loss
3.60 (1.10–11.70) for C1q for graft loss
Viglietti et al. (2017) [49] Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (2-center); renal transplant recipients were unselected Cohort 2008–2011 851 4.25 (1.88–9.61) for IgG3 for graft loss
3.60 (1.71–7.59) for C1q for graft loss
Wiebe et al. (2017) [27] Retrospective analysis of consecutive adult and pediatric renal transplant patients, single center; patients without pretransplant sensitization Cohort 1999–2012 70 1.06 (0.50–2.40) for graft loss
Moktefi et al. (2017) [66] Retrospective analysis (2-center) of patients selected based on the development of acute renal ABMR and the presence of DSAs Cohort 2005–2012 48 0.79 (0.25–2.44) for graft loss
Sicard et al. (2017) [67] Retrospective analysis of consecutive adult renal transplant patients (2-center) with unselected patients Cohort 2004–2012 52 3.71 (1.27–10.80) for graft loss
Das et al. (2017) [68] Retrospective, single-center analysis of pediatric heart transplant without DSAs pre transplantation and at the time of transplantation Cohort 2005–2014 127 3.20 (1.34–7.86) for graft loss
Couchonnal et al. (2017) [69] Retrospective analysis; single-center analysis of consecutive pediatric liver transplant selected on the presence of DSAs during follow-up Cohort 1990–2014 100 4.12 (0.95–17.89) for graft loss
Bailly et al. (2017) [70] Retrospective analysis of multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials; patients selected on the basis of renal ABMR development and DSA detection; patients treated either with standard of care (PP plus IVIg) or rituximab plus standard of care Cohort 2008–2011 25 3.70 (0.80–17.00) for graft loss
Molina et al. (2017) [71] Retrospective analysis; single-center analysis of consecutive adult kidney transplant patients selected on pretransplant DSA detection Cohort 1995–2009 389 4.01 (2.33–6.92) for graft loss

Effect sizes refer to HR for graft survival and OR for rejection appearance.

Abbreviations: ABMR, antibody-mediated rejection; C1q, complement component 1q; CI, confidence interval; DSA, donor-specific antibody; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; HR, hazard ratio; IgG3, immunoglobulin G3; IVIg: intravenous immunoglobulin; NC, not communicated; OR, odds ratio; PP, plasmapheresis.