Memory and vestibular motor performance is significantly reduced after CCI-S. (A) Quantification of average time spent exploring the new object during Novel Object Recognition testing shows that the CCI-S injured mice performed statistically worse than the sham injured controls or CCI-M injured mice. (B) Quantification of average time spent on the Rotarod apparatus showed that the CCI-S injured mice performed significantly worse than the CCI-M injured mice or sham injured controls. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, P < 0.001 (for A n = 19 for sham, n = 18 for CCI-S and n = 12 for CCI-M at 2 weeks and n = 11 for sham, n = 12 for CCI-S and n = 10 for CCI-M at 16 weeks) (for B n = 20 for sham, n = 28 for CCI-S and n = 19 for CCI-M at 3 days and n = 20 for sham, n = 28 for CCI-S and n = 19 for CCI-M at 7 days and n = 12 for sham, n = 13 for CCI-S and n = 9 for CCI-M at 16 weeks).