Skip to main content
. 2018 May 25;4(5):eaar5316. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5316

Table 1. Benchmark of SWM compared to previous Rosetta FARFAR over different classes of RNA structure motifs.

Category Motif properties Best of five cluster centers
RMSD (Å)* FNWC†,*
No. of motifs Length* Strands* SWM FARFAR SWM FARFAR
Single helix or multiple helices with crystallographic context provided
  Trans-helix loop 15 6 1 0.83 3.29 1.00 0.77
  Apical loop 4 4.5 1 1.14 2.96 1.00 1.00
  Two-way junction 14 7.5 2 0.74 1.15 1.00 1.00
  Multi-helix junction 5 11 3 1.91 1.93 0.80 0.33
  Tertiary contact 10 8.5 2 1.25 1.78 0.83 0.50
Multiple helices without crystallographic context provided
  Two-way junction 15 7 2 1.59 1.40 1.00 0.55
  Multi-helix junction 5 10 3 2.60 3.45 0.40 0.20
  Tertiary contact 8 8.5 2 2.89 2.13 0.36 0.20
  Non-helix embedded 5 10 4 2.81 4.30 0.80 0.71
Overall 82 7 2 1.49 1.93 0.96 0.67

*Median values reported. Mean values given in tables S3 and S4.

†Fraction of non–Watson-Crick pairs from experimental structure observed in computational model.