Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;6:e4857. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4857

Table 2. Model selection results for predicting species richness according to migratory bird ratio, vertical (under, mid, overstory vegetation), and horizontal (habitat diversity) habitat heterogeneity.

Uninformative parameters (spring temperature) were removed from models.

Response variables Candidate models AICc ΔAICc df wi
Species richness (No. of species/0.8 ha) (Best model, full model) intercept + OV + MV + UV + HD + MRs 637.7 0.0 7 0.488
Intercept + OV + MV + UV + HD 638.9 1.2 6 0.264
Intercept + OV + MV + UV + MRs 639.3 1.6 6 0.219
Intercept + OV + MV + UV 643.4 5.6 5 0.029
Intercept + HD 660.6 22.9 3 <0.001
Intercept + MRs 660.9 23.2 3 <0.001
Intercept + HD + MRs 662.5 24.8 4 <0.001

Notes:

Coverage of UV, understory vegetation; MV, midstory vegetation; OV, overstory vegetation; ST, spring temperature; HD, habitat diversity; MRs, migratory bird ratio (species).