Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;6:e4817. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4817

Table 2. Comparisons between SampEn and other typical nonstationary and nonlinear analysis methods.

It can be seen that the RQA analysis generally presents negative correlation with BIS although DET has relatively higher correlation with BIS. Compared to entropy methods, the AUC and MAE show inferior values. Both SampEn and PEn have high AUC values, however, the SampEn shows better correlation.

CC AUC MAE
RR (RQA) −0.16 ± 0.16 0.24 ± 0.13 48.60 ± 7.95
DET (RQA) −0.39 ± 0.16 0.16 ± 0.10 58.33 ± 7.98
PEn 0.55 ± 0.24 0.91 ± 0.09 42.81 ± 7.92
SampEn 0.72 ± 0.09 0.95 ± 0.04 47.23 ± 7.84

Notes.

MAE is not an absolute metric because it can decrease through regression. Values are presented with mean ± STD. Markers symbolize the statistical significant Student t-test.

PEn
Permutation
CC
correlation coefficient
AUC
area under curve
MAE
mean absolute error
RQA
recurrence quantification analysis
RR
recurrence rate
DET
determinism
SampEn
sample entropy