Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;6:e4817. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4817

Table 3. Comparisons of performance of the three different regression methods.

Obviously, the Random Forest demonstrates the best capability to correlate the SampEn with BIS. SVM and ANN exhibit similar regression effects. For Random Forest, it has the best performance in terms of all the metrics among all models.

CC AUC MAE
SVM 0.76 ± 0.09 0.95 ± 0.04 9.08 ± 2.72
ANN 0.79 ± 0.08 0.96 ± 0.04 8.88 ± 2.46
Random Forest 0.90 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.02 5.22 ± 1.12

Notes.

Values are presented with mean ± STD. Markers symbolize the statistical significant Student t-test.

SVM
support vector machine
ANN
artificial neural network
CC
correlation coefficient
AUC
area under curve
MAE
mean absolute error