Table 2.

Adjusted odds ratio for predicting tobacco product use at follow-up (n = 1999, N = 357,035) or change in tobacco product susceptibility based on endorsement of outcome expectations at baseline (n = 1,180, N = 209,958).

	AOR* for tobacco product susceptibility at follow-up, (95% CI)	AOR* for tobacco product use at follow-up, (95% CI)
Outcome expectation
Help when I'm feeling stressed	2.97 (1.01, 8.70)	4.21 (1.84, 9.60)
Relax me	2.33 (0.77, 7.03)	2.46 (0.99, 6.09)
Help me concentrate	1.63 (0.25, 10.76)	2.47 (0.54, 11.25)
Energize me	1.73 (0.38, 7.92)	1.34 (0.36, 4.97)
Help me stay slim	1.47 (0.37, 5.80)	0.34 (0.09, 1.26)
Endorse any outcome expectation	1.47 (0.51, 4.19)	2.44 (1.13, 5.26)
Outcome expectations as continuous	1.24 (0.89, 1.73)	1.29 (0.99, 1.67)

Includes 6th, 8th, 10th graders from 5 counties surrounding the 4 largest cities in Texas (Austin, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Houston, San Antonio). “n” represents the sample size; “N” represents the population from which this sample was drawn. Weighted AORs are shown in the Table.

^*adjusted for sex (male, female), race/ethnicity (White/Other, Black non-Hispanic, Hispanic), grade (middle school: 6th and 8th grade; high school: 10th grade), and SES status (LowSES: “just getting by”, “nearly poor”, or “poor”; Middle/High SES: “very well off” or “living comfortably).

Bolded AOR indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).