Skip to main content
. 2018 May 9;2018:5068578. doi: 10.1155/2018/5068578

Table 3.

Genetic model analyses of the association between the SNPs and DKD with adjustment for age and gender.

Genetic models Genotypes DKD DM Without adjustment With adjustment
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
rs3752462 Additive TT 150 (49.5%) 227 (62.4%) 1# 0.004 1# 0.005
TC 128 (42.2%) 115 (31.6%) 1.684 (1.216–2.332) 1.649 (1.187–2.290)
CC 25 (8.3%) 22 (6.0%) 1.720 (0.935–3.162) 1.817 (0.980–3.367)
Dominant TT 150 (49.5%) 227 (62.4%) 1# 0.001,∆ 1# 0.001,∆
TC + CC 153 (50.5%) 137 (37.6%) 1.690 (1.240–2.303) 1.675 (1.225–2.289)
Recessive TT + TC 278 (91.8%) 342 (94.0%) 1# 0.269 1# 0.193
CC 25 (8.2%) 22 (6.0%) 1.398 (0.772–2.533) 1.493 (0.817–2.728)

rs136161 Additive CC 180 (59.4%) 213 (58.5%) 1# 0.944 1# 0.901
CG 104 (34.3%) 126 (34.6%) 0.977 (0.704–1.354) 1.011 (0.726–1.407)
GG 19 (6.3%) 25 (6.9%) 0.899 (0.480–1.686) 0.869 (0.460–1.644)
Dominant CC 180 (59.4%) 213 (58.5%) 1# 0.816 1# 0.933
CG + GG 123 (40.6%) 151 (41.5%) 0.964 (0.707–1.314) 0.987 (0.721–1.350)
Recessive CC + CG 284 (93.7%) 339 (93.1%) 1# 0.757 1# 0.652
GG 19 (6.3%) 25 (6.9%) 0.907 (0.489–1.681) 0.866 (0.463–1.618)

Abbreviations: ORs, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval. #Reference category (odds ratio, 1.0); P value < 0.05; ∆ indicates statistical significance by Holm-Bonferroni correction.