Skip to main content
. 2018 May 25;6(5):2325967118774509. doi: 10.1177/2325967118774509

TABLE 2.

Spearman Correlation Coefficients Between PROMIS PF CAT and Traditional Knee and General Health Instrumentsa

Instrument Baseline 6 Weeks 6 Months 2 Years
SF-36 PF 0.75 (P < .01) 0.80 (P < .01) 0.77 (P < .01) 0.72 (P < .01)
SF-36 GH 0.16 (P = .05) 0.34 (P < .01) 0.32 (P < .01) 0.43 (P < .01)
KOOS-ADL 0.70 (P < .01) 0.63 (P < .01) 0.64 (P < .01) 0.57 (P < .01)
KOOS-sport 0.69 (P < .01) 0.32 (P < .01) 0.57 (P < .01) 0.67 (P < .01)
KOOS-QOL 0.52 (P < .01) 0.58 (P < .01) 0.58 (P < .01) 0.61 (P < .01)
MARS 0.01 (P = .88) 0.00 (P = .42) 0.24 (P < .01) 0.42 (P < .01)
EQ-5D 0.71 (P < .01) 0.68 (P < .01) 0.60 (P < .01) 0.60 (P < .01)

aADL, activities of daily living; EQ-5D, EuroQol–5 dimensions questionnaire; GH, general health; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; MARS, Marx Activity Rating Scale; PF, physical function; PROMIS PF CAT, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function computer adaptive test; QOL, quality of life; SF-36, Short Form–36 Health Survey.