Skip to main content
. 2018 May 25;6(5):2325967118774509. doi: 10.1177/2325967118774509

TABLE 4.

Effect Size of PRO Instruments Between Study Time Periodsa

Baseline to 6 Weeks 6 Weeks to 6 Months
Instrument Effect Size (95% CI) SRM (95% CI) Effect Size (95% CI) SRM (95% CI)
EQ-5D 0.36b (0.19 to 0.53) 0.357 (0.18 to 0.53) 1.15d (0.92 to 1.38) 1.009 (0.78 to 1.23)
KOOS-ADL 0.50c (0.28 to 0.70) 0.405 (0.19 to 0.61) 1.51d (1.24 to 1.78) 1.201 (0.95 to 1.48)
KOOS-sport 0.34b (0.13 to 0.55) 0.274 (0.06 to 0.48) 1.53d (1.25 to 1.80) 1.204 (0.95 to 1.45)
KOOS-QOL 0.41b (0.24 to 0.58) 0.402 (0.23 to 0.57) 1.22d (0.99 to 1.46) 1.098 (0.87 to 1.32)
SF-36 PF 0.07b (–0.12 to 0.25) 0.057 (–0.13 to 0.24) 1.37d (1.10 to 1.64) 1.050 (0.80 to 1.29)
PROMIS PF CAT 0.12b (–0.07 to 0.31) 0.100 (–0.09 to 0.29) 1.43d (1.17 to 1.69) 1.197 (0.95 to 1.44)

aADL, activities of daily living; EQ-5D, EuroQol–5 dimensions questionnaire; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; MARS, Marx Activity Rating Scale; PF, physical function; PRO, patient-reported outcome; PROMIS PF CAT, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function computer adaptive test; QOL, quality of life; SF-36, Short Form–36 Health Survey; SRM, standardized response mean.

bSmall effect size.

cMedium effect size.

dLarge effect size.