Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 12;46(2):637–651. doi: 10.1177/0300060517706643

Table 1.

Distribution of screening performance in urban and rural populations.

Rural population Urban population Statistical analysis
Total number 10,671 8427
First screening
 Age (days) 3.81 (SD, 8.210) 3.24 (SD, 7.073) T = −5.167, P < 0.01
 Referred 2017 (18.9%) 1408 (16.7%) χ2 = 15.393, P < 0.01
Second screening
 Attendance 1361 (67.5%) 1051 (74.6%)
 Age (days) 45.47 (SD, 21.364) 43.78 (SD, 12.673) T = −2.417, P < 0.05
 Referred 272 (20.0%) 166 (15.8%) χ2 = 7.008, P < 0.01
 DPOAE 250 (18.4%) 154 (14.7%) χ2 = 5.873, P < 0.05
 AABR 122 (9.0%) 71 (6.8%) χ2 = 3.929, P < 0.05
Diagnostic tests
 Attendance 106 (39.0%) 79 (47.6%)
 Age (days) 99.25 (SD, 49.047) 105.59 (SD, 46.789) T = 0.849, P > 0.05
 Hearing loss 37 (3.5‰) 26 (3.1‰) χ2 = 1.764, P > 0.05
 Sensorineural 21 (2.0‰) 18 (2.1%)
 Conductive 14 (1.3‰) 6 (0.7‰)
 Mixed 2 (0.2‰) 2 (0.2‰)