Skip to main content
. 2018 May;4(1):33–37. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2018:3:1

Table 2: Summary of Randomised Controlled Trials of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) treated with AF Ablation.

Study Sample size (ablation group) Comparison arm Mean LVEF (%) Follow-up (months) Single procedure success (%) Multiple procedure success (%) Improvement in LVEF (%) Other comments
Khan 2008[48] 81 (41) AVJ, CRT 27 6 68 88 +8 Improved 6MWD and Minnesota score
MacDonald 2011[54] 41 (22) Rate control 36 12 40 50 +4 High rate of complications (%)
Jones 2013[49] 52 (26) Rate control 22 12 68 88 +11 Improved Minnesota score, BNP, peak oxygen consumption
Hunter 2014[50] 366 (67) Rate control 42 20 38 81 +8 Improved Minnesota score, peak oxygen consumption Di
Biase 2016[51] 203 (102) Amiodarone 29 24 70 +8 Improved Minnesota score. Lower mortality and hospitalisation rates
Prabhu 2017[52] 66 (33) Rate control 32 6 56 +18 Absence of LGE predicted LVEF improvement in ablation group
CASTLE-AF 2017[53,55] 363 (179) Medical therapy (32% on AAD, mostly amiodarone) 32 60 +8 Lower mortality and heart failure hospitalisation

AVJ = AV junction ablation; BNP = B-type natriuretic peptide; CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy; LGE = late gadolinium enhancement; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; 6MWD = 6-minute walk distance. Adapted and modified, with permission, from Verma et al.[25]