Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 25;21(2):99–104. doi: 10.1007/s40477-018-0299-0

Table 5.

Results

Independent variable Odds Ratio (95% CI) p
Core needle passes per patient * 0.04
Core needle gauge ** 0.99
Patient BMI * 0.69
Patient BMI ≥30 0.93 (0.21–4.80) 0.99
Skin-to-tumor distance * 0.95
Skin-to-tumor distance ≥7 cm 0.59 (0.14–2.48) 0.52
Thickness of subcut. fat * 0.98
Thickness of subcut. fat ≥3 cm 0.59 (0.14–3.07) 0.47
Involvement of a trainee 1.46 (0.33–6.00) 0.53
Kidney laterality 0.99 (0.24–4.37) 0.99
Cortical location *** 0.83
Endophytic vs. exophytic *** 0.99
Mass size (cm) * 0.30
Mass size <4cm 1.36 (0.25–14.08) 0.99
Enhancement (<20HU) ** 0.99
Cystic * 0.83

*Numeric variable, therefore Wilcoxon two-sample rank-sum test was used for significance testing and the odds ratio was not calculated for individual pairs

**Insufficient data to run formal significance testing on this variable

***Odds Ratio was not calculated for individual pairs