Table 1.
Content validity index based on the rating of the relevancy of items by 10 experts.
Item | Ea1 | E | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | E8 | E9 | E 10 | I-CVIb | |
Q1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1.00 | |
Q2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0.80 | |
Q3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0.90 | |
Q4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0.90 | |
Q5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0.90 | |
Q6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1.00 | |
Q7 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1.00 | |
Q8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0.80 | |
Q9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1.00 | |
Q10 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | |
Content validity index average | 0.91 |
aE: Expert.
bi-CVI: Item Content Validity Index.