Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 2;59(5):523–541. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12832

Table 7.

Programme impacts at follow‐up (T3) for Advancing Adolescents youth versus wait‐list controls (n = 212) and Intent‐to‐Treat youth versus wait‐list controls (n = 302)

Advancing Adolescents sample at T3 Intent‐to‐Treat sample at T3
Pooled cycles 1 and 2 Pooled cycles 1 and 2
β 95% CI p Value Cohen's d β 95% CI p Value Cohen's d
Primary outcomes (regression models 1–3)
Human Insecurity (HI) −10.03 (−15.18, −4.88) <.001 −0.42 −6.09 (−10.59, −1.58) <.01 −0.23
Human Distress (HD) −5.37 (−10.16, −0.58) .03 −0.31 −2.71 (−6.95, 1.53) .21 −0.12
Perceived Stress (PSS) −0.89 (−3.32, 1.53) .47 −0.18 0.23 (−1.86, 2.32) .83 −0.01
Secondary outcomes (regression models 4–6)
Arab Youth Mental Health (AYMH) −1.44 (−3.48, 0.60) .17 −0.29 −0.80 (−2.70, 1.10) .41 −0.12
SDQ total difficulties −0.85 (−2.31, 0.60) .25 −0.22 −0.50 (−1.79, 0.78) .44 −0.11
SDQ prosocial −0.38 (−0.81, 0.05) .08 −0.25 −0.22 (−0.58, 0.15) .24 −0.18
Other outcomes (regression model 7)
Post‐traumatic CRIES −0.86 (−4.434, −2.71) .63 −0.02 0.93 (−2.14, 4.00) .55 0.14

Regression models on follow‐up (T3) score, adjusted for baseline (T1) value of outcome measure, programme cycle, and clustering by family and study site.

β indicates adjusted beta coefficient. Significant p value shown in bold.