Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2017 Dec 21;124(4):923–929. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00880.2017

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2018 the American Physiological Society

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 3. — A: the average run time (h/day) was not significantly different between electromechanical switch wheel cages or magnetic switch wheel cages (n = 6). B: the average speed (km/h) was significantly reduced in the cages with the magnetic switch (n = 6). C: average daily run distance (km/day) is shown for 7 days. Mice in the electromechanical switch wheel cages ran significantly more than those in the magnetic switch wheel cages (n = 6). D: a summary graph of average daily run distance (km/day) is shown (n = 6). A two-tailed t-test was performed to compare the effect of electromechanical and magnetic switch wheel cages on run time, average speed, and average distance (*P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01). A two-way ANOVA was employed to compare the average daily distance between the 2 cage types (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).