Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 26;107(1):35–42. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx007

Table 3.

Associations between DHA variables and 5-y body size and composition in linear regression models1

Dependent variable Independent variable β 95% CI P value
Fat mass, kg DHA group (vs. placebo)2 7.14 –3.28, 17.6 0.18
Maternal RBC PL DHA at Delivery (%)3 0.92 –1.42, 3.27 0.44
Change in Maternal RBC PL DHA (%)3 1.02 –1.22, 3.27 0.37
Fat-free mass, kg DHA group (vs. placebo)2 4.14 –0.29, 8.58 0.067
Maternal RBC PL DHA at Delivery (%)3 1.00 –0.00, 2.00 0.052
Change in Maternal RBC PL DHA (%)3 1.28 0.33, 2.23 0.0088
Body fat,6 % DHA group (vs. placebo)2 0.25 –1.56, 2.05 0.27
Maternal RBC PL DHA at Delivery (%)3 –0.08 –0.48, 0.33 0.71
Change in Maternal RBC PL DHA (%)3 –0.13 –0.51, 0.26 0.53
Height, cm DHA group (vs. placebo)4 0.65 –0.64,1.95 0.32
Maternal RBC PL DHA at delivery (%)5 0.17 –0.12, 0.47 0.25
Change in maternal RBC PL DHA (%)5 0.24 –0.04, 0.52 0.097
Weight, kg DHA group (vs. placebo)4 3.29 –0.97, 7.56 0.13
Maternal RBC PL DHA at delivery (%)5 0.69 –0.30, 1.67 0.17
Change in maternal RBC PL DHA (%)5 0.92 –0.02, 1.86 0.055
BMI z score DHA group (vs. placebo)5 0.21 –0.09, 0.51 0.17
Maternal RBC PL DHA at delivery (%)5 0.04 –0.029, 0.11 0.26
Change in maternal RBC PL DHA (%)5 0.05 –0.015, 0.12 0.13
1

The table presents the regression coefficient and 95% CI of prenatal DHA variables in a linear regression model including child sex and, for the first 3 dependent variables, age at body composition assessment by air displacement plethysmography (Bod Pod). Due to log transformation of weight, fat mass, and fat-free mass, the regression coefficients for these models represent percent increase. PL, phospholipid; RBC, red blood cell.

2

n = 154.

3

n = 149;

4

n = 171;

5

n = 166.

6

Regression coefficients for percentage of fat-free mass are the opposite of the percentage of body fat.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure