Abstract
Editing domains of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases correct tRNA charging errors to maintain translational fidelity. A mutation in the editing domain of alanyl tRNA synthetase (AlaRS) in Aarssti mutant mice resulted in an increased production of serine-mischarged tRNAAla and degeneration of cerebellar Purkinje cells. By positional cloning, we identified Ankrd16, which acts epistatically with the Aarssti mutation to attenuate neurodegeneration. ANKRD16, a vertebrate-specific, ankyrin repeat-containing protein, binds directly to the catalytic domain of AlaRS. Serine misactivated by AlaRS is captured by lysine side chains of ANKRD16, preventing the charging of serine adenylates to tRNAAla and precluding serine misincorporation in nascent peptides. Deletion of Ankrd16 in the Aarssti/sti brain causes widespread protein aggregation and neuron loss. These results identify a novel amino acid-accepting co-regulator of tRNA synthetase editing as a new layer of the machinery essential for preventing severe pathologies that arise from defects in editing.
Accurate aminoacylation of tRNAs by tRNA synthetases establishes the universal genetic code and occurs in two steps: first, activation of the selected amino acid with ATP to form an aminoacyl adenylate; second, transfer of the aminoacyl group of the adenylate to the 2’- or 3’-OH of the cognate tRNA. However, structural similarities between some amino acids allow misactivation of non-cognate amino acids and subsequent misacylation of tRNA. These errors can be corrected by the hydrolytic editing functions found in many tRNA synthetases 1, 2. ‘Editing’ can occur after amino acid misactivation, but prior to aminoacyl transfer, or after aminoacylation of tRNA, known as pre-transfer and post-transfer editing, respectively. Pre-transfer editing occurs in either the aminoacylation active site or in a distinct editing site, whereas post-transfer editing occurs only in the editing site of these enzymes 3, 4, 5.
The importance of tRNA synthetase editing including editing by the alanyl tRNA synthetase (Aars; AlaRS) has been shown in multiple organisms 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. Although AlaRS misactivates both glycine and serine, misactivation of serine appears to have more serious consequences, perhaps due to the presence of D-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylases which act on Gly-tRNAAla 12, 13, 14. We previously showed that sticky (sti) mutant mice that have a point mutation (Ala734Glu) in the editing domain of AlaRS have ubiquitinated protein aggregates in cerebellar Purkinje cells and subsequent degeneration of these neurons 9. The sti mutation results in only a 2-fold increase in the generation of Ser-tRNAAla, demonstrating that Purkinje cells are particularly sensitive to loss of AlaRS editing 9.
Here we identified a novel vertebrate-specific gene Ankrd16 that greatly attenuates misfolded aggregate formation and Purkinje cell degeneration in Aarssti/sti mice. Deletion of Ankrd16 in other Aarssti/sti neurons also caused formation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates and neuron death. ANKRD16 binds to AlaRS and prevents misincorporation of serine at alanine codons in nascent peptides by stimulating serine-dependent ATP hydrolysis prior to tRNA aminoacylation via acceptance of misactivated serines. Our data collectively reveal ANKRD16 as a co-regulator of AlaRS that protects against assaults on translation fidelity and proteostasis in mammalian neurons.
Results
Ankrd16 suppresses Aarssti-mediated Purkinje cell degeneration
Aarssti/sti mice on the inbred C57BL/6J (B6) genetic background are ataxic with cerebellar Purkinje cell degeneration beginning at 3 weeks of age 9. However, neither ataxia nor Purkinje cell degeneration was apparent in 9/10 F2 Aarssti/sti mice from a B6.Aarssti/+ and CAST/Ei (CAST) mating at 12–16 months old, suggesting that CAST-derived alleles could suppress neuron loss. In agreement, two phenotypically distinct classes of N1 Aarssti/sti offspring (generated from a backcross of F1 B6/CAST Aarssti/sti mice to B6.Aarssti/+ mice) were observed at equal frequencies: mice with ataxia and extensive Purkinje cell loss similar to that of B6.Aarssti/sti mice and mice without ataxia and little Purkinje cell loss (Extended Data Fig. 1a). Suppression of the neurodegenerative phenotype was observed in 50% of backcross mice from crosses to CASA/RkJ (CASA; a strain closely related to CAST/Ei), but not in other crosses, suggesting that a single dominant allele from the CAST or CASA strains can suppress sti-mediated neurodegeneration (Extended Data Fig. 1a).
Genome scans on affected and unaffected N1 Aarssti/sti mice revealed that the Purkinje cell degeneration was suppressed in mice that were heterozygous for CAST alleles on proximal Chromosome 2 (Extended Data Fig. 1b). This locus (~3.3Mbp) also segregated with the Aarssti/sti modifier gene from CASA, suggesting these strains share the same suppressor gene. Transfer of the Modifier of sticky (Msti) locus from the CAST genome onto the B6.Aarssti/sti genetic background rescued the decreased latency to fall in a rotorod test of 3-month-old B6.Aarssti/sti mice and dramatically reduced Purkinje cell death, although some neurons in the rostral cerebellum of these mice still degenerated (Fig. 1a, 1b). Heterozygosity and homozygosity for CAST alleles in the Msti region similarly attenuated Purkinje cell loss, in agreement with the dominant nature of Msti (Fig. 1b).
Ubiquitin punctae characteristic of protein inclusions were observed in many Purkinje cells in 4-week-old B6.Aarssti/sti, but not in B6 or CAST, mice (data not shown). As expected due to progressive Purkinje cell loss observed in sti mutant mice, the number of Purkinje cells containing inclusions decreased by 6 and 12 weeks of age. However, very few Purkinje cells in B6.MstiCAST/B6; Aarssti/sti mice contained inclusions, even at later ages, confirming long-term protection of Purkinje cells (Fig. 1c).
We further localized Msti to a 0.63 Mbp region and the coding regions of the protein-coding genes in this interval were amplified by RT-PCR from B6 and CAST cerebellar RNA and sequenced (Fig. 2a). Non-synonymous SNPs were observed in Il2rα, Fbxo18, and Ankrd16 (Fig. 2a). However, with the exception of Il2rα, these SNPs were either not present in CASA, an Aarssti/sti modifying strain (Fbxo18), or were also present in MOLF (Ankrd16), a strain in which neurodegeneration is not rescued (Extended Data Fig. 1a and 1c).
A strain-specific Ankrd16 transcript that contained a 138 bp cryptic exon (exon 5’) was also observed in B6 (with or without the Aarssti/sti mutation) and other non-rescuing strains, but was absent in CAST or CASA (Fig. 2b, Extended Data Fig. 1d and e). Sequence analysis of intron 5 suggested that inclusion of this exon was due to a SNP that generated a novel alternative splice site (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 1f). Transcript levels of the correctly spliced Ankrd16 isoform (lacking exon 5’) were 3.3 and 5.3 fold higher in the congenic MstiCAST/B6 or CAST cerebellum relative to B6, respectively (Fig. 2d). Protein levels were 2.8 ± 0.2 and 3.9 ± 0.22 fold higher in the B6.MstiCAST/B6 and CAST cerebellum, respectively, and the Aarssti/sti mutation did not alter Ankrd16 splicing or protein levels (Fig. 2e, Extended Data Fig 1e and g). Increased ANKRD16 levels were also observed in other tissues from MstiCAST/B6 mice (Extended Data Fig. 1h). The Ankrd16 transcript with exon 5’ contains a premature stop codon and is predicted to undergo nonsense-mediated decay and in agreement, truncated forms of ANKRD16 were not observed (Fig. 2e, Extended Data Fig. 1g).
Neurodegeneration in Aarssti/sti mice was modified neither by transgenic expression of the CAST Il2rα cDNA nor deletion of Il2rα (data not shown). However, suppression of Aarssti/sti-mediated Purkinje cell loss was observed in mutant mice that carried a CAST BAC transgene containing the 3’portion of the Il15rα gene, and the Fbxo18 and Ankrd16 genes (Fig. 2f). However, another transgenic line (Tg25L9-19) generated with this BAC in which Ankrd16 was deleted upon integration was not able to suppress Purkinje cell degeneration (Fig. 2f, Extended Data Fig. 1i). Indeed, transgenic expression of the Ankrd16CAST coding sequence using the Purkinje cell-specific promoter Pcp2 in B6.Aarssti/sti mice suppressed the death of these neurons (Fig. 2g).
ANKRD16 binds AlaRS to reduce misincorporation of serine
ANKRD16 encodes a 39 kDa protein of unknown function that is composed of nine repeats of the ankyrin protein-protein interaction domain and is found only in vertebrates (Extended Data Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 1j). To identify proteins that interact with ANKRD16, we transgenically expressed Ankrd16-myc under the control of the chicken beta-actin promoter and cytomegalovirus enhancer 15, 16. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) of ANKRD16 was performed using livers of transgenic and non-transgenic mice, and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed via tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Surprisingly, AlaRS was the most abundant protein after the ANKRD16 bait protein (Extended Data Fig. 2a). Interaction of ANKRD16 with wild type or mutant AlaRS in the liver and brain was confirmed by Co-IP/western blotting (data not shown and Fig. 3a). Interactions between ANKRD16 and AlaRS were independent of both the epitope tag and bait protein (Extended Data Fig. 2b and c).
Co-IP experiments demonstrated that the AlaRS aminoacylation domain was efficiently co-immunoprecipitated by ANKRD16, and little interaction was observed in the absence of this domain (Fig. 3b, Extended Data Fig. 2b). Affinity-capture experiments using purified AlaRS protein further defined that the AlaRS catalytic domain was sufficient for ANKRD16 interaction and that this interaction was direct (Extended Data Fig. 2e, Fig. 3c). Furthermore, AlaRS did not Co-IP ANKRD29, a protein comprised of 8 ankyrin repeats (Extended Data Fig. 2d), nor did ANKRD16 interact with tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase or tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (Fig. 3c), suggesting a specific ANKRD16-AlaRS interaction with similar binding dynamics between AlaRSWT and AlaRSA734E (Extended Data Fig. 2f).
The AlaRSA734E mutation leads to increased death of Aarssti/sti embryonic fibroblasts when cultured with increasing concentrations of serine 9. MstiCAST/B6; Aarssti/sti fibroblasts were more resistant than B6.Aarssti/sti fibroblasts to high serine concentrations, and at the highest concentrations (40 mM), less cell death was observed in MstiCAST/B6; Aarssti/sti than in B6 (MstiB6/B6) fibroblasts demonstrating that Ankrd16 suppresses serine-mediated cell death in Aarssti/sti cells (Fig. 3d)
Although ANKRD16 is a vertebrate-specific gene, mammalian and E. coli AlaRS are highly conserved with ~67% similarity in the catalytic domain. Indeed, mouse ANKRD16 was able to affinity-capture E. coli AlaRS (Fig. 3c), and reduced death of E. coli with a severe editing domain mutation (C666A/Q584H) in AlaRS when grown on a serine gradient (Fig. 3e). Together, these results suggest that ANKRD16 influences AlaRS function.
Next, we used dipeptide formation on defined ribosome complexes as a read-out of charging and decoding fidelity. These experiments sufficiently detected serine mistranslation and AlaRS-mediated editing of Ser-tRNAAla (Extended Data Fig. 3a and b). When reactions using Ser-tRNAAla and AlaRS were supplemented with alanine, loss of fMet-Ser coincided with gain of fMet-Ala (Fig. 4a), consistent with reported post-transfer editing by AlaRS 7. However, no obvious differences were observed between reactions using AlaRSWT or AlaRSA734E, and ANKRD16 had no effect on either reaction in these experiments using mischarged tRNA.
In contrast, when deacyl tRNAAla, serine, and ATP were used, AlaRSA734E generated more fMet-Ser than AlaRSWT and ANKRD16 reduced the amount of this aberrant dipeptide in reactions with either AlaRSA734E or AlaRSWT (Extended Data Fig. 3c). Although ANKRD16 interacts with AlaRS1–455 (Extended Data Fig. 2f), no reduction in the amount of aberrant dipeptide was observed, implying the editing and/or C-terminal domains of AlaRS may contribute to ANKRD16 function. Furthermore, in the presence of ATP and a mixture of Ser and Ala, ANKRD16 specifically decreased fMet-Ser formation, thereby increasing AlaRSA734E fidelity (i.e., fMet-Ala/fMet-Ser) by a factor of ~20 (Fig. 4b). Thus, ANKRD16 acts prior to formation of mischarged tRNA to enhance translational fidelity.
In agreement, ANKRD16 had no effect on subsequent steps of tRNA mischarging including deacylation of mischarged Ser-tRNAAla, transfer of the mischarged tRNA to EF-Tu, or activation/aminoacylation of the cognate amino acid alanine (Extended Data Fig. 3d–g). In addition to post-transfer editing activity, in E. coli pre-transfer editing has also been observed in AlaRS 17. Serine-dependent ATPase activity was also observed with mouse AlaRSWT in the absence of tRNA (Extended Data Fig. 4a). However, this activity was decreased with both AlaRSA734E and AlaRS1–455 (Fig. 4c, Extended Data Fig. 4b). ANKRD16 was able to restore that activity for AlaRSA734E, but not for AlaRS1–455, further suggesting that the editing domain contributes to the serine-dependent ATPase activity and/or the modulation of this activity by ANKRD16 (Fig. 4c, Extended Data Fig. 4b and c).
Unexpectedly, ANKRD16 appeared to stimulate tRNA-dependent precipitation of 3H-serine but not of 3H-alanine in reactions with AlaRSA734E (Extended Data Fig. 4d–f). However, misactivated 3H-serine was also precipitated in reactions without tRNAAla with approximately three linked-serine adducts per ANKRD16 (Extended Data Fig. 4g). In contrast, 3H-alanine-adduct formation per ANKRD16 with AlaRSA734E, in the absence of tRNAAla, was much lower (Extended Data Fig. 4h). Furthermore, in the presence of tRNAAla and AlaRSA734E, alanine linked to ANKRD16 was negligible relative to that coupled to tRNAAla (Fig. 4d).
These results suggest that ANKRD16 functions as an alternative to water or tRNAAla, accepting misactivated serine. Previous studies have demonstrated that reactive aminoacyl adenylates may react with cysteine or lysine residues 18, 19, 20, 21. Levels of precipitated serine were only slightly diminished after prolonged exposure to alkaline pH, which hydrolyzes thiol esters (e.g. cysteine). Thus, the ANKRD16 serine adduct is likely an amide (e.g. lysine) (Extended Data Fig. 4i).
To identify residues of ANKRD16 that accept misactivated serine, we utilized mass spectrometry. No spectral shift with Cys-containing peptides was observed. While not all Lys-containing peptides of ANKRD16 were resolved, highly conserved lysines - K102, K135, and K165 - shifted by 87 Da (the mass of serine) (Extended Data Fig. 1j, Extended Data Fig. 5a–d). Therefore, we mutated those Lys codons to Arg (ANKRD163xArg) (Extended Data Fig. 4g). Circular dichroism spectroscopy and thermal shift assays suggested that wild type and ANKRD163xArg have similar secondary structures and stabilities (Extended Data Fig. 5e and f), and only a slight change (~2 fold) in affinity for AlaRSA734E (Extended Data Fig. 2f and 5g). In contrast to ANKRD16, ANKRD163xArg had no effect on AlaRSA734E pre-transfer editing (Fig 4e, Extended Data Fig. 4b). Unlike ANKRD16, which rescued AlaRSC666A/Q584H. E. coli growth in high levels of serine, ANKRD163xArg did not rescue growth of mutant bacteria under these conditions (Fig. 4f). Similarly, serine-induced death of B6.Aarssti/sti embryonic fibroblasts was prevented by expression of Ankrd16, but not Ankrd163xArg (Fig. 4g, Extended Data Fig. 6). Accordingly, we generated a model for the ANKRD16-AlaRS complex (Fig. 4h). Modified lysine side chains of ANKRD16 project out from the helix-loop-helix motifs, with each in close proximity to the active site of AlaRS, where serine is misactivated.
Complete loss of Ankrd16 in Aarssti/sti mice leads to extensive neurodegeneration
To determine if the specificity of neuron death in Aarssti/sti mice is correlated with the ANKRD16 levels, we performed immunofluorescence. ANKRD16 was widely expressed in the brain and was detected in the nucleus as well as the cytoplasm (Fig. 5a, Extended Data Fig. 7a, b). Intriguingly, ANKRD16 levels were lower in Purkinje cells relative to cerebellar granule cells, cells of the cerebellar molecular layer, hippocampal neurons, and cells in the cortex (Fig. 5a).
To test if the levels of Ankrd16 influence the sensitivity of cells to the Aarssti/sti mutation, we generated an Ankrd16 null allele (Extended Data Fig. 7c, d). Ankrd16−/− mutant mice had no obvious pathologies in the brain or other organs, even when aged to 12 months (data not shown). However, loss of Ankrd16 in Aarssti/sti mice resulted in early embryonic lethality (Extended Data Fig. 7e). These results show that the low levels of ANKRD16 present in B6 mice are sufficient to resolve sti-mediated editing defects induced during embryonic development.
To determine the impact of decreasing ANKRD16 levels on neuronal cell survival we conditionally deleted Ankrd16 in postnatal Purkinje cells in Aarssti/sti mice. Purkinje cell loss in B6.Pcp2-Cre; Ankrd16fl/−; Aarssti/sti mice began at about 3 weeks of age; by 4 weeks of age, the majority of Purkinje cells were absent and in contrast to Aarssti/sti mice, all Purkinje cells had degenerated by 7 months of age (Extended Data Fig. 8a and Extended Data Fig. 9a). Formation of ubiquitin- and p62-positive aggregates was also accelerated in Purkinje cells with aggregates observed in 12.3% of Purkinje cells compared to 2.5% of these neurons in Aarssti/sti mice at 3-weeks of age (Extended Data Fig. 9a).
Deletion of Ankrd16 in the embryonic cerebellar primordium using En1-Cre 22 resulted in protein aggregates and neuron death in interneurons in the molecular layer and neurons in the granule cell layer in addition to Purkinje cells (Extended Data Fig. 8b, 8c, and 9b). Furthermore, loss of Ankrd16 in postnatal cortical and hippocampal neurons also caused their degeneration. Ubiquitin- and p62-positive aggregates were observed both in hippocampal pyramidal cells (2.80% ± 0.22%) and cortical neurons in 2-month-old B6.CaMKIIa-Cre; Ankrd16fl/−; Aarssti/sti mice (Fig. 5b–d, Extended Data Fig. 9c). Together, these data demonstrate that neurons other than Purkinje cells are also sensitive to the effects of mistranslation and further suggest that ANKRD16 protects against mistranslation in a dose-dependent fashion.
Discussion
In contrast to known editing mechanisms of tRNA synthetases or free-standing homologs of editing domains that act autonomously 23, 24, tRNA-independent hydrolysis of misactivated serine by AlaRS is enhanced through binding of ANKRD16 which captures misactivated serine and removes it from the pool for protein synthesis (Extended Data Fig. 10a and b). Unlike most tRNA synthetases, AlaRS not only misactivates smaller (glycine) but also larger (serine) amino acids than alanine due to structural properties that make it difficult for AlaRS to exclude misactivated serine 2, 24, 25, 26, 27. Thus, serine misactivation by AlaRS, and the toxic effects of Ser-for-Ala replacements in vertebrates, may present a special situation in which an editing co-factor is necessary for proofreading.
In addition to providing direct mechanistic insights into editing functions of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, the discovery of Ankrd16 highlights the importance of studing mRNA translation in higher organism and may provide understanding for the cell-type sensitivity of phenotypes associated with the Aarssti mutation. More broadly, cell-type selectivity resulting from “monogenic” mutations in ubiquitous genes has been difficult to resolve. Only a few modifier genes of disease mutations have been identified in an unbiased approach and these suggest that modifier genes may function in independent, parallel pathways 28, 29, 30. Our identification of Ankrd16 as a modifier of the Aarssti mutation demonstrates that this possibility may be an oversimplification and that restricted pathologies may be due to the expression levels of genes that modify the function of the gene harboring the primary mutation.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank K. Brown, J. Cook, T. Jucius, and A. Kano for technical assistance and the microinjection core at The Jackson Laboratory for transgenic mouse production. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health R01NS42613 to S.L.A., R01GM072528 to K.F., R01CA92577 and a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Cancer Research to P.S. S.L.A. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Footnotes
Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper.
Author Contributions S.L.A., K.F., P.S., M.T., and M-N.V. designed experiments and wrote the paper. M.T., J-W.L., and H.F. performed mouse and cell culture experiments, M-N.V., L.S. and T.G.W. performed biochemical experiments, B.R. and Q.L. performed di-peptide experiments, and J.J.M. performed the mass spectrometry under J.Y.’s guidance.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Guo M, Chong YE, Shapiro R, Beebe K, Yang XL, Schimmel P. Paradox of mistranslation of serine for alanine caused by AlaRS recognition dilemma. Nature. 2009;462:808–812. doi: 10.1038/nature08612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schimmel P. Mistranslation and its control by tRNA synthetases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011;366:2965–2971. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ling J, Reynolds N, Ibba M. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis and translational quality control. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;63:61–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martinis SA, Boniecki MT. The balance between pre- and post-transfer editing in tRNA synthetases. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:455–459. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dulic M, Cvetesic N, Perona JJ, Gruic-Sovulj I. Partitioning of tRNA-dependent editing between pre- and post-transfer pathways in class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:23799–23809. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.133553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schimmel P. Development of tRNA synthetases and connection to genetic code and disease. Protein Sci. 2008;17:1643–1652. doi: 10.1110/ps.037242.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Beebe K, Pouplana LRDe, Schimmel P. Elucidation of tRNA-dependent editing by a class II tRNA synthetase and significance for cell viability. EMBO. 2003;22 doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nangle LA, Motta CM, Schimmel P. Global effects of mistranslation from an editing defect in mammalian cells. Chem. Biol. 2006;13:1091–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee JW, Beebe K, Nangle LA, Jang J, Longo-Guess CM, Cook SA, Davisson MT, Sundberg JP, Schimmel P, Ackerman SA. Editing-defective tRNA synthetase causes protein misfolding and neurodegeneration. Nature. 2006;443:50–55. doi: 10.1038/nature05096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lu J, Bergert M, Walther A, Suter B. Double-sieving-defective aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase causes protein mistranslation and affects cellular physiology and development. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5650. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu Y, Satz JS, Vo MN, Nangle LA, Schimmel P, Ackerman SL. Deficiencies in tRNA synthetase editing activity cause cardioproteinopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111:17570–17575. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420196111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Calendar R, Berg P. D-tyrosyl RNA: formation, hydrolysis and utilization for protein synthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 1967;26:39–54. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90259-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pawar KI, Suma K, Seenivasan A, Kuncha SK. Role of D-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase beyond chiral proofreading as a cellular defense against glycine mischarging by AlaRS. Elife. 2017 doi: 10.7554/eLife.24001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Calendar R. D-tyrosyl-tRNA deacylase: a new function. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017;42:684–686. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hitoshi N, Ken-ichi Y, Jun-ichi M. Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene. 1991;108:193–199. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90434-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Okabe M, Ikawa M, Kominami K, Nakanishi T, Nishimune Y. ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett. 1997;407:313–319. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00313-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsui WC, Fersht AR. Probing the principles of amino acid selection using the alanyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981;9:4627–4637. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.18.4627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yanagisawa T, Sumida T, Ishii R, Takemoto C, Yokoyama S. A paralog of lysyl-tRNA synthetase aminoacylates a conserved lysine residue in translation elongation factor P. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17:1136–1143. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.He X, et al. Sensing and transmitting intracellular amino acid signals through reversible lysine aminoacylations. Cell Metab. 2018;27:151–166. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jakubowski H. Protein homocysteinylation: possible mechanism underlying pathological consequences of elevated homocysteine levels. FASEB J. 1999;13:2277–2283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jakubowski H. Quality control in tRNA charging - editing of homocysteine. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2011;58:149–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kimmel RA, Turnbull DH, Blanquet V, Wurst W, Loomis CA, Joyner AL. Two lineage boundaries coordinate vertebrate apical ectodermal ridge formation. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1377–1389. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beebe K, Mock M, Merriman E, Schimmel P. Distinct domains of tRNA synthetase recognize the same base pair. Nature. 2008;451:90–93. doi: 10.1038/nature06454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chong YE, Yang XL, Schimmel P. Natural homolog of tRNA synthetase editing domain rescues conditional lethality caused by mistranslation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:30073–30078. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805943200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fersht AR. Editing Mechanisms in Protein-Synthesis - Rejection of valine by isoleucyl-transfer-RNA Synthetase. Biochemistry. 1977;16:1025–1030. doi: 10.1021/bi00624a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jakubowski H, Goldman E. Editing of errors in selection of amino acids for protein synthesis. Microbiol. Rev. 1992;56:412–429. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.3.412-429.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ibba M, Söll D. Quality control mechanisms during translation. Science. 1999;286:1893–1897. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5446.1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Van Ham TJ, Breitling R, Swertz MA, Nollen EAA. Neurodegenerative diseases: Lessons from genome-wide screens in small model organisms. EMBO Mol. Med. 2009;1:360–370. doi: 10.1002/emmm.200900051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen X, Burgoyne RD. Identification of common genetic modifiers of neurodegenerative diseases from an integrative analysis of diverse genetic screens in model organisms. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lenz S, Karsten P, Schulz JB, Voigt A. Drosophila as a screening tool to study human neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neurochem. 2013;127:453–460. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.