Table 40.2.
Author (ref #) Year country |
Ink brand or homemade in pharmacy | Medical use | # of study participants and areas injected | Adverse events/reactions | Other problems/comments? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sun [24] 2009 China |
Pelikan | Long-term localization of atrophic gastritis | 53 patients | None | None |
Fennerty [17] 1992 USA |
Pelikan, | localization of colonic lesions | 26 patients with 32 india ink tattoos in colonic mucosa | Biopsies showed carbon particles in the mucosa, but no inflammatory reactions. | The mean follow-up time was 14 months. All follow-up visits showed the mucosa still darkly tattooed |
Shaffer [22] 1999 USA |
Difco India Ink (now BD) | localization of Barrett’s mucosa in esophagus | 19 patients | None | None |
Shatz [23] 1991 USA |
Higgins | Localization of colonic lesions | 64 patients | None | One patient had ink injected through the wall of the sigmoid into the peritoneal cavity, but was asymptomatic. Leakage may occur and obscure the polypectomy site. |
Choy [38] 2015 USA |
Spot | Localization of axillary lymph nodes (breast cancer) | 28 patients | Inadvertent staining of lymphatic channels proximal to the node, migration of ink between nodes causing inadvertent staining of additional nodes. | One tattoo wasn’t visualized. Authors believe that may be due to the injection being a small volume. For 3 patients the pigment was detected during surgery, but not during histology. Staining of a lymph node that was not a sentinel node occurred in one patient. |
Hwang [18] 2010 Korea |
Spot | Localization of colonic lesions | 20 patients | Local leakage was seen with one patient (without peritonitis or abdominal pain). No other adverse events. | India ink does not diffuse through the mesentery and is thus permanent. |
Park [20] 2008 Korea |
Spot | Localization of colorectal tumors | 63 patients | 1 patient had ink diffused extensively. 6 patients had localized diffusion of ink; 1 patient had chills. | Patient with extensive diffusion made lesion hard to see. |
Cipe [16] 2016 Turkey |
Spot | Localization of distal surgical margin for rectal cancer | 40 patients received marking; 25 patients were controls. | None | None |
Aboosy [15] 2005 Netherlands |
Rotring | Localization of soft colorectal lesions | 19 patients with small lesions | None | 5 patients had India ink particles present in lymph nodes |
McArthur [19] 1999 USA |
Koh-I-Noor, | Localization of colonic lesions | 195 patients: 50 marked before surgery and 145 marked for future localization | No patients reported any incidence of fever or persistent abdominal pain and no examinations revealed evidence of abdominal tenderness. | Ink was injected through the bowel wall in a few cases. |
Salomon [21] 1993 USA |
Koh-I-Noor (& homemade) | Localization of colonic lesions | 20 patients; 12 had undergone resection. | 2 patients had pigmented histiocytes and mild chronic inflammation. Others had superficial mucosal ulceration, granulation of tissue containing ink stained histiocytes, ink staining of macrophages in local lymph nodes. | They were unable to keep the homemade ink in suspension so only Koh-I-Noor was used. |