Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;9(37):24830–24836. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24982

Table 2. Summary of protocol completeness assessment for each sub-item of the SPIRIT# checklist (n=126).

Item
NO.
No. of protocols assessed as
Score 2* Score 1* Score 0* N/A*
Administrative information
Title 1 100 (79.4%) 20 (15.9%) 6 (4.8%) 0
Trial registration 2a 2 (1.6%) 23 (18.3%) 101 (80.2%) 0
2b 1 (0.8%) 23 (18.3%) 102 (81.0%) 0
Protocol version 3 20 (15.9%) 16 (12.7%) 90 (71.4%) 0
Funding 4 13 (10.3%) 2 (1.6%) 111 (88.1%) 0
Roles and responsibilities 5a 29 (23.0%) 28 (22.2%) 69 (54.8%) 0
5b 38 (30.2%) 19 (15.1%) 69 (54.8%) 0
5c 2 (1.6%) 4 (3.2%) 120 (95.2%) 0
5d 1 (0.8%) 2 (1.6%) 123 (97.6%) 0
Introduction
Background and rationale 6a 96 (76.2%) 16 (12.7%) 14 (11.1%) 0
6b 57 (45.2%) 36 (28.6%) 31 (24.6%) 2 (1.6%)
Objectives 7 111 (88.1%) 7 (5.6%) 8 (6.3%) 0
Trial design 8 76 (60.3%) 23 (18.3%) 26 (20.6%) 0
Methods: Participants, interventions, and outcomes
Study setting 9 83 (65.9%) 4 (3.2%) 39 (31.0%) 0
Eligibility criteria 10 112 (82.4%) 8 (6.3%) 6 (4.8%) 0
Interventions 11a 105 (83.3%) 11 (8.7%) 10 (7.9%) 0
11b 29(23.0%) 9 (7.1%) 88 (69.8%) 0
11c 6 (4.8%) 3 (2.4%) 117 (92.9%) 0
11d 5 (4.0%) 5 (4.0%) 116 (92.1%) 0
Outcomes 12 111 (88.1%) 12 (9.5%) 3 (2.4%) 0
Participant timeline 13 34 (27.0%) 1 (0.8%) 91 (72.2%) 0
Sample size 14 28 (22.2%) 60 (47.6%) 38 (30.2%) 0
Recruitment 15 15 (11.9%) 29 (23.0%) 82 (65.1%) 0
Methods: Assignment of interventions (for controlled trials)
Allocation:
Sequence generation 16a 30 (23.8%) 21 (16.7%) 69 (54.8%) 6(4.8%)
Allocation concealment mechanism 16b 11 (8.7%) 15 (11.9%) 92 (73.0%) 8(6.3%)
Implementation 16c 4 (3.2%) 12 (9.5%) 103 (81.7%) 7(5.6%)
Blinding 17a 20 (15.9%) 8(6.3%) 33 (26.2%) 65 (51.6%)
17b 6 (4.8%) 1 (0.8%) 54 (42.9%) 65 (51.6%)
Methods: Data collection, management and analysis
Data collection methods 18a 11 (8.7%) 31 (24.6%) 84 (66.7%) 0
18b 3 (2.4%) 7(5.6%) 116 (92.1%) 0
Data management 19 8 (6.3%) 4 (3.2%) 114 (90.5%) 0
Statistical methods 20a 59 (46.8%) 13 (10.3%) 54 (42.9%) 0
20b 6(4.8%) 8 (6.3%) 112 (88.9%) 0
20c 3 (2.4%) 4 (3.2%) 119 (94.4%) 0
Methods: Monitoring
Data monitoring 21a 6(4.8%) 2 (1.6%) 118 (93.7%) 0
21b 3 (2.4%) 1 (0.8%) 122 (96.8%) 0
Harms 22 33 (26.2%) 10 (7.9%) 83 (65.9%) 0
Auditing 23 1 (0.8%) 1 (0.8%) 124 (98.4%) 0
Ethics and dissemination
Research ethics approval 24 61 (48.4%) 10 (7.9%) 55 (43.7%) 0
Protocol amendments 25 10 (7.9%) 2 (1.6%) 114 (90.5%) 0
Consent or assent 26a 78 (61.9%) 9 (7.1%) 39 (31.0%) 0
26b 1 (0.8%) 2 (1.6%) 51 (40.5%) 72 (57.1%)
Confidentiality 27 14 (11.1%) 3 (2.4%) 108 (85.7%) 0
Declaration of interests 28 1 (0.8%) 3 (2.4%) 122 (96.8%) 0
Access to data 29 7 (5.6%) 5 (4.0%) 114 (90.5%) 0
Ancillary and post-trial care 30 4 (3.2%) 4 (3.2%) 118 (93.7%) 0
Dissemination policy 31a 4 (3.2%) 3 (2.4%) 119 (94.4%) 0
31b 0 2 (1.6%) 124 (98.4%) 0
31c 0 1 (0.8%) 125 (99.2%) 0
Appendices
Informed consent materials 32 3 (2.4%) 0 123 (97.6%) 0
Biological specimen 33 1 (0.8%) 0 49 (38.9%) 76(60.3%)

# SPIRIT: Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials. *A score of 2 indicated that all important information was adequately reported in the protocol for that sub-item; a score of 1 indicated that some important information was inadequately reported; a score of 0 indicated that no information related to the sub-item was reported. N/A indicated that the item was not applicable to the specific protocol.