Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;38(5):458–465. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.458

Table 2. Diagnostic performance of the Architect, Liaison, and Platelia assays.

Panel results (N) Kappa coefficient (95% CI) Sensitivity, % (95% CI) Specificity, % (95% CI)
Positive Negative
VCA IgM
 Architect Positive 6 0 0.89 (0.68–1.00) 85.7 (48.7–97.4) 100.0 (78.5–100.0)
Negative 1 14
 Liaison Positive 5 0 0.77 (0.47–1.00) 71.4 (35.9–91.8) 100.0 (78.5–100.0)
Negative 2 14
 Platelia Positive 6 0 0.89 (0.68–1.00) 85.7 (48.7–97.4) 100.0 (78.5–100.0)
Negative 1 14
VCA IgG
 Architect Positive 17 2 0.62 (0.15–1.00) 100.0 (81.6–100.0) 50.0 (15.0–85.0)
Negative 0 2
 Liaison Positive 17 3 0.35 (−0.17–0.87) 100.0 (81.6–100.0) 25.0 (4.6–69.9)
Negative 0 1
 Platelia Positive 14 0 0.64 (0.29–0.99) 82.4 (59.0–93.8) 100.0 (51.0–100.0)
Negative 3 4
EBNA IgG
 Architect Positive 14 0 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 100.0 (78.5–100.0) 100.0 (64.6–100.0)
Negative 0 7
 Liaison Positive 13 0 0.90 (0.70–1.00) 92.9 (68.5–98.7) 100.0 (64.6–100.0)
Negative 1 7
 Platelia Positive 13 0 0.90 (0.70–1.00) 92.9 (68.5–98.7) 100.0 (64.6–100.0)
Negative 1 7

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EBNA, Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen; VCA, viral capsid antigen.