Table 2.
Pearson correlation coefficients (r), p values and coefficient of variation for EDV, ESV, SV and EF between our interventional system and the two commercially available techniques
| Interventional system versus CVI42 | Interventional system versus TomTec | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDV (ml) | ESV (ml) | SV (ml) | EF (%) | EDV (ml) | ESV (ml) | SV (ml) | EF (%) | |
| Pearson Corr. | 0.980 | 0.984 | 0.996 | 0.993 | 0.723 | 0.755 | 0.639 | 0.665 |
| p values | 0.0120 | 0.0073 | 0.0343 | 0.0256 | ||||
| CoV (%) | 0.173 | 0.310 | 0.896 | 0.943 | 8.277 | 11.038 | 11.066 | 11.091 |
In total 16 patients and 3 volunteers were processed for the comparison between our interventional system and circle CVI42 and 11 patients were processed for the comparison between our interventional system and TomTec software