Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 30;13(6):777–786. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1748-0

Table 2.

Pearson correlation coefficients (r), p values and coefficient of variation for EDV, ESV, SV and EF between our interventional system and the two commercially available techniques

Interventional system versus CVI42 Interventional system versus TomTec
EDV (ml) ESV (ml) SV (ml) EF (%) EDV (ml) ESV (ml) SV (ml) EF (%)
Pearson Corr. 0.980 0.984 0.996 0.993 0.723 0.755 0.639 0.665
p values 1.013-12 1.950-13 7.339-18 1.6184-16 0.0120 0.0073 0.0343 0.0256
CoV (%) 0.173 0.310 0.896 0.943 8.277 11.038 11.066 11.091

In total 16 patients and 3 volunteers were processed for the comparison between our interventional system and circle CVI42 and 11 patients were processed for the comparison between our interventional system and TomTec software