Skip to main content
. 2018 May 29;8:8201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25607-1

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Focal injections of OT and AVP into ACCg reduce staring, flatten social hierarchy, and enhance behavioral synchronization. (A) Both OT and AVP injections reduce staring by M1 (n = 60 face-off sessions * 3 treatment conditions). Black line: gamma fit of saline distribution; magenta line: gamma fit of OT distribution; maroon line: gamma fit of AVP distribution; arrows indicate medians. (B) OT and AVP injections also reduce staring by M2. Black line: gamma fit of saline distribution; magenta line: gamma fit of OT distribution; maroon line: gamma fit of AVP distribution; arrows indicate medians. Insert: Neither OT (pink) nor AVP (red) treatment significantly change the average time (in s) M1 spent staring at an empty chair. Error bars: mean ± SEM. (C) Both OT and AVP injections in ACCg decrease the difference between M1 and M2 staring. X axis: monkey pairs ordered by staring difference between M1 and M2 under saline; left to right corresponds to increasing dominance of M1 over M2. (D) AVP but not OT injection also significantly reduces the turning away time of M1. Error bars: mean ± SEM. (E) OT and AVP injections into ACCg both enhance the cross correlation between M1 and M2’s staring. Thickness of the curves indicates mean ± SEM. (F) OT and AVP injections into ACCg also enhance the cross correlation between M2 staring and M1 turning away. Thickness of the curves indicates mean ± SEM.