Skip to main content
. 2018 May 21;373(1750):20170224. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0224

Table 1.

Bioprinting techniques summary and examples of use.

bioprinting technology summary of technology examples of tissue structures produced benefits drawbacks average resolution
ink-jet thermal, electromagnetic or piezo-electric force propels droplets of bio-ink to defined area vascular [10]
skin [10]
osteochondral [11,12]
ovarian [13]
liver [14]
neural [15]
high resolution potential for high cellular stress during deposition; nozzle blockage common; expensive technology 20+ µm; picolitres (pl) deposition;
single/few cells possible per deposition
valve-based pressure based deposition of bio-ink droplet through valve embryonic [16]
liver [17]
gentler than ink-jet; high resolution available;
high droplet deposition (1000 s−1)
need for constant external pressure supply; nozzle blockage common 40+ µm; nanolitres (nl) deposition; single/few cells per deposition
stereolithography photocuring of photo-sensitive polymer by UV light produces solid structure from bath of acellular material or cellular bio-ink vascular [18]
liver [19]
very high resolution; high-throughput and fast printing possible using digital mirror device technology excess bio-ink needed to create curing bath; UV radiation, photo-initiator and resultant free radicals are toxic to cells; expensive technology 150+ nm (higher with cell-laden ink); specific cell deposition not possible
laser-assisted laser is fired to push cell from pool of bio-ink onto target surface fibroblast [20]
vascular [21]
highest resolution of bioprinting possible; flexibility of printing material viscosity excess bio-ink needed to create pool; potential damage to cells; expensive technology single-cell resolution possible
extrusion deposition of materials through motor-driven extruder neural [22]
liver [23]
vascular [24,25]
pancreatic [26]
embryonic [27,28]
osteochondral [29]
flexibility with printing material viscosity; cell-friendly printing process; coaxial or multiple nozzles allow printing various bio-inks; affordable technology low resolution; slow print times 50 µm; cell aggregate or spheroid deposition only