Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;145(10):1962–1982. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817000747

Table 3.

HPV 9-valent vaccine immunogenicity findings of included studies

Study population Analysis HPV type Immunogenicity comparison with qHPV vaccine
Month 7 GMT ratio Month 7 seroconversion % difference
Females, 16–26 years [34]* Per-protocol Anti-HPV-6 1·02 (0·99–1·06) 0·0 (−0·3 to 0·2)
Anti-HPV-11 0·80 (0·77–0·83) 0·0 (−0·1 to 0·2)
Anti-HPV-16 0·99 (0·96–1·03) 0·0 (−0·1 to 0·2)
Anti-HPV-18 1·19 (1·14–1·23) 0·1 (−0·1 to 0·4)
Females, 9–15 years [43] Anti-HPV-6 1·07 (0·93–1·23)
Anti-HPV-11 0·93 (0·80–1·08)
Anti-HPV-16 0·97 (0·85–1·11)*
Anti-HPV-18 1·08 (0·91–1·29)*
Males, 16–26 years [41]* Per-protocol Anti-HPV-6 1·23 (1·04–1·45) −0·5 (−0·6 to 0·2)
Anti-HPV-11 0·89 (0·76–1·04) 0·0 (0–0)
Anti-HPV-16 1·04 (0·89–1·21) 0·0 (−0·1 to 0)
Anti-HPV-18 1·12 (0·91–1·37) 0·0 (−0·1 to 0)

qHPV, human papillomavirus quadrivalent vaccine; GMT, geometric mean titer.

*

The P value for non-inferiority was <0·001 for all comparisons HPV 9-valent vaccine vs. qHPV vaccine.