Skip to main content
. 2018 May 29;11:35. doi: 10.1186/s12284-018-0227-0

Table 5.

Mean comparison of QTL classes of grain yield (kg ha−1) across BC1F3 to BC1F7 generations under reproductive-stage drought stress and irrigated non-stress control conditions in MR219 background at IRRI, Philippines

QTL class QTL 2013DS 2014DS 2015DS
NS RS NS RS NS RS
BC1F3 BC1F3 BC1F5 BC1F7 BC1F7
Population size
214 214 620 620 70 70
A qDTY 12.1 6229 a 654 b 6967 b 301 a
B qDTY12.1 + qDTY2.2 6633 b 761 bc 7364 ac 598 b 5986 a 540 c
C qDTY12.1 + qDTY3.1 6652 ac 1072 d 7532 cd 794 e 7111 c 672 d
D qDTY 2.2 6760 ab 904 cd 7079 ba 669 bc 6957 c 393 b
E qDTY2.2 + qDTY3.1 7158 bc 1112 d 7243 cd 663 c 6843 bc 679 d
F qDTY2.2 + qDTY3.1 + qDTY12.1 6799 ab 642 b 7106 ad 442 b 6674 bc 578 cd
G qDTY 3.1 6488 a 890 c 7374 ac 568 c 6923 bc 537 bcd
X Parent 5917 ab 13 a 6519 b 0 ab 6148 ab 0 a
Trial mean 6705 781 7173 505 6663 486
F- value 2.0 11.76 9.45 19.39 7.76 6.18
p-value 0.05 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0004 <.0001

The letter display are QTL class labels ordered by mean grain yield of QTL class. Means followed by the same letter (within a column) are not significantly different, DS dry season, WS wet season, NS non-stress, RS reproductive-stage drought stress, X recipient parent (no QTL)