Skip to main content
. 2018 May 29;11:35. doi: 10.1186/s12284-018-0227-0

Table 6.

Comparison of genotyping cost (USD) considering advancement of all QTL classes versus advancement of only higher performing F3 generation QTL classes

Background Generation Number of QTL classes Population size Cost (USD) Total genotyping cost (USD) Savings (USD)
Based on all classes Based on selected classes Based on all classes Based on selected classes Based on all classes Based on selected classes
Swarna-Sub1 F3 15 754 754 5655 5655 21,420 8978 12,443
F4 15 754 106 5655 795
F5 10 432 106 3240 795
F6 10 432 106 3240 795
F7 6 432 108 3240 810
F8 5 52 17 390 127.50
IR64-Sub1 F3 20 467 467 7005 7005 12,105 8385 3720
F4 19 194 46 2910 690
F5 19 64 18 960 270
F6 13 64 18 960 270
F7 7 18 10 270 150
Samba Mahsuri BC1F3 3 42 42 210 210 21,760 6980 14,780
BC1F4 3 3000 640 15,000 3200
BC1F5 3 1200 640 6000 3200
BC1F6 3 70 44 350 220
BC1F7 2 20 15 100 75
BC1F8 2 20 15 100 75
TDK1-Sub1 BC2F3 14 843 843 6323 6323 9225 6954 2272
BC2F4 7 231 43 1733 323
BC2F5 7 48 14 360 105
BC2F6 7 48 14 360 105
BC2F7 5 60 13 450 98
MR219 BC1F3 7 214 214 1605 1605 11,955 5730 6225
BC1F4 7 620 240 4650 1800
BC1F5 7 620 240 4650 1800
BC1F6 7 70 35 525 262.50
BC1F7 7 70 35 525 262.50

The genotyping cost was calculated considering five markers per QTL (one peak/near the peak, two right-hand-side flanking markers, and two left-hand-side flanking markers) and USD 0.50 per data point