Table II.
Platform | Read length; method |
Pros | Cons | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
Illumina | Up to 300 bp; clustered amplicon | Inexpensive, low error rate | PCR bias in library prep*; short reads | [40] |
Ion torrent | Up to 400 bp; on-bead amplicon | Fast, inexpensive | Lower yield; high error rate in homopolymer tracts | [27] |
Pacific Biosciences | Up to 50 kb; single molecule | Long reads; can assemble complex satellite regions | Expensive; high error rate** | [5] |
Oxford Nanopore | Up to 300 kb; single molecule | Longest reads | High error rate; extracting high molecular weight DNA is limiting | Jain et al., bioRxiv 10.1101/170373 |
Optical mapping (nanochannel) | Up to 220 kb; single molecule | Long-range positional information; orthogonal method to sequencing | Requires a reference genome; large nicking intervals preclude mapping simple sequences | [41] |
PCR-free libraries reduce bias.
PacBio also offers a Circular Consensus Sequencing (CSS) approach, where single circular molecules are read multiple times, thus generating a high quality consensus for each molecule.