Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;33(6):855–862. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4311-3

Table 1.

Characteristics of the population (N = 89)

Variable Control
(n = 45)
Intervention
(n = 44)
Statistical comparison
(n = 85)
Demographics
 Gender χ2 (1) = 2.19, p = 0.14
  Male 19 12
  Female 26 32
 Age (years) χ2 (4) = 5.65, p = 0.23
<30 3 1
  31–40 20 17
  41–50 16 14
  51–60 6 8
  62+ 0 4
 Race χ2 (4) = 2.48, p = 0.65
  Non-Hispanic white 29 29
  Black/African American 1 2
  Asian 14 12
  Multiracial 0 1
  Other 1 0
 Ethnicity χ2 (1) = 4.10, p = 0.04
  Non-Hispanic 41 44
  Hispanic 4 0
 Certification
  Internal medicine 40 40
  Physician assistant 5 4
  Years in practice χ2 (6) = 14.34, p = 0.03
<5 18 6
  5 to 10 8 11
  11–15 3 7
  16–20 11 8
  21–25 4 4
  26–30 1 4
  31+ 0 4
 Full-time or part-time practice X2 (1) = 0.90, p = 0.76
  Full-time 13 14
  Part-time 32 30
  Personal history of melanoma N/A
  No 45 44
 Family history of melanoma χ2 (1) = 4.80, p = 0.03
  No 38 43
  Yes 7 1
Psychosocial variables
 Patient care
  Importance of knowing difference between melanoma and benign nevi 8.02 (1.32) 7.70 (2.01) t = 0.88, p = 0.38
  Confusion about diagnosing 6.38 (1.71) 6.05 (2.18) t = 0.80, p = 0.43
  Confident in diagnosis 3.38 (2.09) 3.70 (2.04) t = −0.75, p = 0.46
  Priority given to evaluate moles 4.29 (2.57) 5.20 (2.39) t = −1.74, p = 0.09
  Likely to check moles 1.84 (2.58) 2.57 (2.12) t = −1.45, p = 0.152
  Personal relevance 0.18 (5.06) 0.41 (4.86) t = −0.22, p = 0.83
  Willing to learn 3.24 (2.01) 3.89 (1.67) t = −1.63, p = 0.106
  Assessment of performance in comparison with other primary care physicians 0.16 (1.830 0.70 (1.86) t = −1.40, p = 0.165