Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropharmacology. 2018 Mar 28;135:487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.03.021

Table 2.

Statistical output from Experiment 2.

Model df AIC BIC logLik Test L.Ratio p-value
Acquisition of methamphetamine self-administration

Baseline Model 1 6 1509.63 1527.28 −748.82
Adding Session Factor 2 7 1511.54 1532.13 −748.77 1 vs 2 0.09 0.77
Adding Lever Factor 3 8 1373.14 1396.67 −678.57 2 vs 3 140.40 0.00
Adding Session × Lever 4 9 1375.06 1401.54 −678.53 3 vs 4 0.08 0.78

The effect estrous on responding for methamphetamine (prior to dose-effect phase)

Baseline Model 1 4 1372.54 1384.31 −682.27
Adding Estrous Factor 2 5 1373.56 1388.27 −681.78 1 vs 2 0.98 0.32

The effect of bupropion on responding for methamphetamine

Baseline Model 1 5 436.99 445.43 −213.49
Adding Dose Factor 2 8 419.57 433.08 −201.79 1 vs 2 23.42 0.00
Adding Activity Factor 3 9 407.78 422.98 −194.89 2 vs 3 13.79 0.00
Adding Dose × Activity 4 12 410.90 431.17 −193.45 3 vs 4 2.88 0.41

The effect estrous on responding for methamphetamine (after dose-effect phase)

Baseline Model 1 4 614.79 623.43 −303.40
Adding Estrous Factor 2 5 616.65 627.44 −303.32 1 vs 2 0.15 0.70

The effect of bupropion on methamphetamine-triggered reinstatement

Baseline Model 1 5 301.20 307.29 −145.60
Adding Dose Factor 2 9 289.33 300.30 −135.67 1 vs 2 19.87 0.00
Adding Activity Factor 3 10 288.57 300.76 −134.29 2 vs 3 2.76 0.10
Adding Dose × Activity 4 14 291.73 308.80 −131.87 3 vs 4 4.84 0.30