Table 2.
complex | XRD CuII–O (Å)a | predicted Badger’s CuIII–O (Å)b | ΔCu(II)–Cu(III) (Å)c | DFT predicted ΔCu(II)–Cu(III) (Å)d |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.845(4) | 1.80 | 0.05 | 0.048 |
2 | 1.859(2) | 1.81 | 0.05 | 0.045 |
3 | 1.885(2)e | 1.81 | 0.08f | 0.102 |
1.891(2)e |
Determined from crystal structure, with estimated standard deviations indicated in parentheses.
Determined by Badger’s Rule (Figure 3c) from ν(Cu–O).
CuII–O distance (XRD) minus CuIII–O distance (predicted by Badger’s rule).
Two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit.
Using the average CuII–O value of the two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit.