Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Mar 20;139(12):4477–4485. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00210

Table 2.

Cu–O Bond Lengths in CuII– and CuIII–OH Complexes

complex XRD CuII–O (Å)a predicted Badger’s CuIII–O (Å)b ΔCu(II)–Cu(III) (Å)c DFT predicted ΔCu(II)–Cu(III) (Å)d
1 1.845(4) 1.80 0.05 0.048
2 1.859(2) 1.81 0.05 0.045
3 1.885(2)e 1.81 0.08f 0.102
1.891(2)e
a

Determined from crystal structure, with estimated standard deviations indicated in parentheses.

b

Determined by Badger’s Rule (Figure 3c) from ν(Cu–O).

c

CuII–O distance (XRD) minus CuIII–O distance (predicted by Badger’s rule).

d

CuII–O distance minus CuIII–O distance as predicted by DFT, using PBE0/TZVP (ref 3, Table 3).

e

Two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit.

f

Using the average CuII–O value of the two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit.