Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Microsc Microanal. 2017 Dec 6;23(6):1197–1206. doi: 10.1017/S1431927617012740

Table 2.

Number of Potential Equine Zygotes with Abnormal Morphologies at 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16h After Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (0h) Per Total Injected Oocytes Matured In Vivo (IVO) or In Vitro (IVM).

Abnormality 4 h 6 h 8 h 12 h 16 h Total Zygotes
Premature chromosome condensation
 IVO 0/5 (0) 0/6 (0) 0/5 (0) 0/5 (0) 0/7 (0) 0/28 (0)
 IVM 1/8 (13) 1/8 (13) 2/8 (25) 0/10 (0) 1/10 (10) 5/44 (11)
Multiple (>2) pronuclei
 IVO 0/5 (0) 0/6 (0) 0/5 (0) 0/5 (0) 0/7 (0) 0/28 (0)
 IVM 1/8 (13) 0/8 (0) 0/8 (0) 0/10 (0) 0/10 (0) 1/44 (3)
Sperm chromatin induced ectopic polar body
 IVO 0/5 (0) 0/6 (0) 0/5 (0) 0/5 (0) 0/7 (0) 0/28 (0)
 IVM 0/8 (0) 1/8 (13) 3/8 (30) 0/10 (0) 0/10 (0) 4/44 (9)
Multipolar spindle
 IVO 0/5 (0) 0/6 (0) 0/5 (0) 1/5 (20) 0/7 (0) 1/28 (4)
 IVM 0/8 (0) 0/8 (0) 0/8 (0) 0/10 (0) 1/10 (10) 1/44 (2)
Scattered chromosomes and sperm head intact
 IVO 0/5 (0) 0/6 (0) 0/5 (0) 0/5 (0) 2/7 (29) 2/28 (7)
 IVM 0/8 (0) 0/8 (0) 0/8 (0) 1/10 (10) 1/10 (10) 2/44 (5)
Total abnormalities
 IVO 0/5 (0) 0/6 (0) 0/5 (0) 1/5 (20) 2/7 (29) 3/28a (11)
 IVM 2/8 (25) 2/8 (25) 5/8 (63) 1/10 (10) 3/10 (30) 13/44b (30)

The total number of zygotes with morphologic abnormalities was higher (p = 0.04) for IVM when compared to IVO (as denoted by bold numbers and different superscripts).