Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 3;3(3):722–731. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.01.014

Table 2.

Comparison of Fluidigm BioMark Versus Nanostring nCounter system

Parameters Nanostring Fluidigm
Cost of instrument (estimated/USD)a 225,000 (nCounter Max) 235,000 (BioMark)
Cost per sample (estimated/USD)a 67 21
Multiplexing option 96 well plate and others 96 well plate and others
Input RNA 50 ng 50 ng
Probes used nanostring/amplicons 50 bases 50−100 bp
Sensitivity ∼1 copy per cell ∼1 copy per cell
Detection limit Single copy mRNA Single copy mRNA
Throughput per day Up to 39,600 data points Up to 50,688 data points
Time to result ∼22 h for one 12-sample cartridge. This includes hybridization, sample preparation, and time with the Digital Analyzer ∼8 h for one 96 × 96 chip (∼up to 48 that include cDNA synthesis, target specific amplification, priming of the chip and QPCR run.
Dynamic range ∼6 logs ∼ 6−7 logs
Analysis software Uses nSolver Analysis Software. Freely available Uses Singular Toolset Software. Freely available
No. of genes that can be assessed 800 genes Flexible, ideal for 20−200 genes
Types of samples Fresh or frozen cells and tissue, FFPE, biological fluids Fresh or frozen cells and tissue, FFPE, biological fluids

bp, base pair; FFPE, formalin-fix, paraffin-embedded; QPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

a

Listed costs are as of January 2017 and are subject to change by vendors.