Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;2018:1571807. doi: 10.1155/2018/1571807

Table 2.

Effects of 12 weeks of traditional fitness training and team sport training.

N,
FiG/TsG
FiG
Within-group
TsG
Within-group
TsG estimated mean difference from FiG
Weight (kg) 32/36 −1.9 (−3.2, −0.5) −1.3 (−2.4, −0.2) 0.5 (−1.2, 2.2)
Fat mass (kg) 32/36 −1.6 (−2.7, −0.4) −0.9 (−1.5, −0.2) 0.6 (−0.6, 1.9)
LBM (kg) 32/36 −0.4 (−1.1, 0.2) −0.2 (−0.8, 0.4) 0.2 (−0.7, 1.0)
Aerobic fitness (mlO2/kg/min) 22/29 1.1 (−0.0, 2.2) 0.5 (−0.5, 1.5) −0.6 (−2.1, 0.8)
STS (stand/30 s) 19/15 3.5 (2.6, 4.5) 1.5 (−0.3, 3.3) −2.1 (−3.9, −0.2)∗∗
Balance (s) 12/11 4.5 (0.0, 9.5) 3.6 (0.6, 6.5) 0.2 (−4.3, 4.7)
6MWT (m) 27/17 54.4 (33.3, 75.6) 27.2 (2.4, 52.0) −28.0 (−57.7, 1.6)
Attendance (%) 29/34 67.4 (56.7, 78.2) 59.1 (50.7, 67.4) −8.4 (−21.5, 4.8)∗∗

Within-group effects (P ≤ 0.05). ∗∗Between-group effects (P ≤ 0.05). Within-group data presented as change scores (95% CI), attendance as mean (95% CI), and between-group data as estimated mean difference (95% CI) with FiG as reference group. LBM: lean body mass. STS: sit-to-stand. 6MWT: 6-minute walking test.