Skip to main content
. 2018 May 3;7(5):69. doi: 10.3390/foods7050069

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of the incidence of pathogens in chicken and other poultry meat by packaging status. Heterogeneity analysis comprises between-study variability to total variability ratio (I2) and proportion of between-study variability explained by packaging status (R2).

Microorganism Product (n) Pooled Prevalence 95% CI Pooled Prevalence Heterogeneity
Campylobacter spp. Chicken I2 = 0.419
R2 = 0.018
Packed (20) 0.472 (0.194–0.769)
Unpacked (9) 0.471 (0.131–0.841)
Other Poultry I2 = 0.211
R2 = NA *
Packed (18) 0.311 (0.195–0.456)
L. monocytogenes Chicken I2 = 0.330
R2 = 0.034
Packed (37) 0.185 (0.114–0.287)
Unpacked (8) 0.307 (0.114–0.605)
Other Poultry I2 = 0.408
R2 = 0.047
Packed (18) 0.125 (0.074–0.201)
Unpacked (12) 0.148 (0.079–0.260)
Salmonella spp. Chicken I2 = 0.455
R2 = 0.007
Packed (17) 0.031 (0.010–0.097)
Unpacked (9) 0.048 (0.021–0.108)
Other Poultry I2 = 0.258
R2 = NA
Packed (25) 0.079 (0.039–0.150)
S. aureus Chicken I2 = 0.483
R2 = NA
Packed (15) 0.408 (0.165–0.708)
Other Poultry I2 = 0.313
R2 = 0.157
Packed (6) 0.298 (0.152–0.502)
Unpacked (5) 0.413 (0.189–0.679)

(*) Not applicable.