Skip to main content
. 2018 May 22;10(5):277. doi: 10.3390/v10050277

Table 3.

Average NAb to vaccine viruses and heterologous subtype-A FIV viruses a,b.

FIV Strain (Subtype) c Location of FIV Isolation Ave Fel-O-Vax NAb Titer (% Responder) d Ave IWV NAb Titer (% Responder) d Combined % Preventable Fraction
Fel-O-Vax d IWV d
FIV-Pet (A) Petaluma CA, U.S. 216 (63%) 118 (83%) 100% 100%
FIV-Shi (D) Shizuoka, Japan 60 (74%) 96 (78%) 100% b --
FIV-Dix (A) Dixon CA, U.S. -- 80 (70%) b -- --
FIV-U.S.(A) U.S. -- -- 68.5% --
FIV-UK8 (A) Glasgow, UK 10 (30%) 10 (13%) 0% 40%
FIV-Dutch (A) Netherland -- -- 85.6% --
FIV-Bang (A/B) Boston, MA, U.S. 22 (70%) 73 (61%) 25.0% 71.4%
FIV-FC1 (B) Florida, U.S. 10 (30%) 10 (13%) 71.8–75.0% 100%
FIV-MD (B) Maryland, U.S. 20 (62%) b 10 (36%) b -- --
FIV-Ao2 (B) Aomori, Japan -- -- 100% b --
FIV-NZ1 (F′/C) New Zealand 10 (20%) <5 (0%) 40.0% 75.0%

aTable 3 is the summary of Table 1 with emphasis on NAb titers generated by Fel-O-Vax® FIV vaccine and prototype IWV vaccine. b Additional data provided are on the average NAb titers to FIVDix [55] and to FIVMD [49], and on the dual-subtype FIVPet-ICV/FIVShi-ICV vaccine against FIVShi challenge [60]. c Vaccine strains (bolded). d Substantial NAb titers (bolded) or significant percent preventative fraction (bolded) when p < 0.05; Not available (--).