Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 5;5:324–332. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.02.009

Table 5.

Effects of AEVAL on Hepatic Indicators of Oxidative Stress and Lipid Peroxidation in Wistar Rats with Cd-Induced Liver Injury.

Indicators of Oxidative Stress
Indicator of Lipid Peroxidation
Groups GSH (μg/mg protein) SOD (mM/mg protein) CAT (μmol/min/mg protein) TBARS (nmol/mg protein)
[1] Control 5.68 ± 0.30 1.15 ± 0.08 2.60 ± 0.10 35.65 ± 0.80
[2a] Cd 1.07 ± 0.25c 0.32 ± 0.07c 1.08 ± 0.09c 84.90 ± 1.20c
[2b] Cd + Recovery 2.00 ± 0.29c 0.66 ± 0.07c,a 1.49 ± 0.09c,a 62.25 ± 1.10c,a
[3] Cd + 100 mg/kg AEVAL 4.87 ± 0.18a,b 1.01 ± 0.06a,b 2.37 ± 0.07a,b 36.55 ± 1.00a,b
[4] Cd + 200 mg/kg AEVAL 5.35 ± 0.28a,b 1.07 ± 0.05a,b 2.43 ± 0.10a,b 32.33 ± 0.77a,b
[5] Cd + 400 mg/kg AEVAL 4.60 ± 0.35a,b 0.98 ± 0.04a,b 2.20 ± 0.10a,b 38.63 ± 1.10a,b,d

Each value represents mean ± standard error of mean (p < 0.05).

a

Significantly different from Cd group.

b

Significantly different from Cd + recovery group.

c

Significantly different from control group.

d

Significantly different from Cd + 200 mg/kg AEVAL.