Table 2.

Model comparison

	Model 1						Model 9
	β	SE	t	p	95% CI		β	SE	t	p	95% CI
					Lower	Upper					Lower	Upper
Social cognition	1.36	0.19	7.19	<0.001	0.98	1.74	1.06	0.20	5.39	<0.001	0.66	1.45
IPL–dlPFC connectivity							0.92	0.28	3.28	0.002	0.36	1.49
(Intercept)	0.84	0.06	13.51	<0.001	0.72	0.97	0.43	0.14	3.16	0.003	0.16	0.71
BIC	68.1						61.7
R2	0.51						0.60
Observations	51

The dependent variable was control-averse behavior. Individual differences in control-averse behavior were predicted by social cognition and right IPL–dlPFC connectivity in the controlled minus the free condition (models 1 and 9 in Fig. 7).