Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Dev. 2017 Jul 31;45:141–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.07.002

Table 5.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses of Item Recognition Task-related EEG (4–7 Hz) Predicting Academic Achievement, after Controlling for Verbal IQ and Baseline EEG

R R2 R2Δ F β t sr2
    a. Reading Comprehension
Step 1. .28 .07 9.20***
     Verbal IQ .28 4.24*** .08
     T Baseline EEG −.08 −1.28 .01
Step 2. .28 .07 .00 .22 6.18***
     Verbal IQ .28 4.24*** .08
     T Baseline EEG −.12 −1.18 .01
     Item Recognition EEG .05 .47 .00

    b. Reading Fluency
Step 1. .26 .07 6.21**
     Verbal IQ .27 3.52*** .07
     T Baseline EEG −.06 −.80 .00
Step 2. .28 .08 .01 1.73 4.73**
     Verbal IQ .26 3.44*** .06
     T Baseline EEG −.17 −1.51 .01
     Item Recognition EEG .15 1.32 .01

    c. Calculation
Step 1. .27 .08 8.91***
     Verbal IQ .26 3.98*** .07
     T Baseline EEG −.13 −1.99** .02
Step 2. .28 .08 .00 .56 6.11***
     Verbal IQ .26 3.96*** .07
     T Baseline EEG −.07 −.68 .00
     Item Recognition EEG −.08 −.75 .00

    d. Math Fluency
Step 1. .24 .06 6.65**
     Verbal IQ .23 3.47*** .05
     T Baseline EEG −.11 −1.68* .01
Step 2. .25 .06 .00 .82 4.70**
     Verbal IQ .23 3.46*** .05
     T Baseline EEG −.04 −.37 .00
     Item Recognition EEG −.09 −.91 .00

Note:

***

p ≤. 001

**

p≤.01

*

p≤.05.

The p-values for the final step of the regressions were < .001, .003, < .001, and .001 for reading comprehension, reading fluency, calculation, and math fluency, respectively.