Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Funct Mater. 2011 May 31;21(15):2876–2888. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201100297

Figure 8. RGD Surface Density Displayed by Adsorbed HFN and Mixed GRGD/OEG3 SAMs.

Figure 8

XPS was used to estimate the RGD surface density displayed by HFN adsorbed to bare Au or by mixed GRGD/OEG3 alkanethiol SAMs. (A) Bare Au surfaces were exposed to HFN solution for 30 mins at 37 °C with concentrations from 1.5–50.0 μg ml−1, the surfaces rinsed, and the N1s spectra acquired with XPS at each concentration (see Supplemental Fig. S1 and Table S1). The area under the N1s peak was measured for each condition to quantify the amount of protein present. The HFN surface density was estimated by setting the saturation concentration to a previously published fibronectin packing density. The HFN surface density on the remaining surfaces was ratiometrically back calculated using the measured areas under the N1s peaks. The RGD surface density was determined by multiplying the HFN surface density by the number of RGD motifs, two, displayed on each HFN molecule. (B) A similar method was used to estimate the RGD surface density displayed by mixed SAMs of GRGD- and OEG3-terminated alkanethiols. Bare Au surfaces were exposed to solutions of mixed alkanethiols at a working concentration of 2 mM for 1 hr. The percent of GRGD-terminated alkanethiol in solution was varied from 0.5–10.0% (for example, the 10% GRGD solution was comprised of equal volumes of 0.2 mM GRGD- and 1.8 mM OEG3-terminated alkanethiols). The area under the N1s peak (see Supplemental Fig. S2 and Table S2) for each GRGD concentration was measured and the packing density of the 1% GRGD surface set to a previously published value. The RGD surface density for the remaining surfaces was ratiometrically back calculated using the N1s peak areas.