Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 22;11(5):614–630. doi: 10.1111/eva.12591

Table 3.

Pairwise F ST between sampling sites for mitochondrial (a) and nuclear (b) DNA

Gulf of Lion Malta Greece Azores Spain Hawaii New Zealand
(a)
Malta −0.004
Greece −0.064 −0.078
Azores 0.024 0.004 −0.035
Spain 0.012 −0.002 −0.163 0.0312
Hawaii −0.008 −0.028 −0.061 −0.040 0.0007
New Zealand 0.044* 0.020 0.040 −0.010 0.069* −0.050
Australia 0.084*** 0.061 0.127* −0.003 0.123** 0.014 −0.008
(b)
Malta −0.001
Greece 0.021 0.013
Azores 0.001 −0.003 0.021
Spain 0.005 −0.0004 0.040 −0.001
Hawaii −0.010 −0.009 −0.015 −0.012 −0.007
New Zealand 0.003 0.0001 0.024 0.007* 0.009* −0.0123
Australia 0.001 0.001 0.053* 0.002 0.008 −0.002 0.008

The significance of the F ST values was assessed via 1,000 permutations: *for p‐values < .05, **for p‐values < .01 and ***for p‐values < .001. Once corrected for multiple tests (using the false discovery rate, Storey, 2003), only F ST between Australia and the Gulf of Lion for cytb (a) remained significant.