Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;11(5):820–826. doi: 10.1111/eva.12578

Table 1.

Heteroplasmy (Hp) estimates in each of the samples separately

Locality Year NB NHp Proportion of Hp individuals Hp sites/individual Average frequency of heteroplasmies
Uncontaminated
Nedanchychy 1998 11 11 0.727 1.182 0.134
Nedanchychy 2011 12 12 0.750 1.250 0.076
Nezamozhnya 1998 12 11 (12) 0.636 (0.667) 1.000 (3.083) 0.031
Nezamozhnya 2011 12 10 0.500 0.900 0.110
Oranoe 1998 15 12 (13) 0.583 (0.615) 0.833 (2.231) 0.083
Oranoe 2011 14 11 0.545 0.909 0.134
In total 76 67 (69) 0.627 (0.638) 1.015 (1.638) 0.078
Contaminated
Glyboke Lake 1998 15 14 0.571 0.929 0.032
Glyboke Lake 2011 3 3 0.667 1.000 0.070
Red Forest 1998 20 18 0.722 1.167 0.055
Red Forest 2011 17 11 0.455 0.455 0.062
In total 55 46 0.609 0.913 0.050

For the average frequency of all heteroplasmies, frequency of the heteroplasmic allele was calculated separately for each heteroplasmy site within individuals. For the two samples with “outlier” individuals, Nezamozhnya and Oranoe (both 1998), values in parentheses are the estimates including the outliers. NB represent the original sample sizes in Baker et al. (2017), while NHp is the amount of individuals used in the present heteroplasmy analysis.