Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0195581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195581

Table 3. Association of personality disorders with urban stressors in the Sao Paulo Metropolitan Area, adjusted for sex, age and all urban stressors simultaneously.

Cluster A Cluster B Cluster C Any personality disorder
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Urbanicity
    Rural areas 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    Small town 1.1 (0.4–3.1) 1.3 (0.5–3.6) 1.1 (0.4–2.8) 1.2 (0.5–3.0)
    Large cities 1.2 (0.4–3.8) 0.9 (0.2–3.6) 0.8 (0.3–2.5) 1.0 (0.4–2.5)
Migration status
    Non-migrants 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    Migrants 1.2 (0.5–3.4) 1.0 (0.2–3.9) 0.9 (0.4–2.0) 1.1 (0.5–2.6)
Neighborhood Social Deprivation
    No-low NSD 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    Low-medium/medium NSD 1.0 (0.4–2.9) 0.9 (0.3–2.6) 1.1 (0.5–2.5) 1.1 (0.4–2.9)
    High/very high NSD 1.3 (0.6–3.1) 1.3 (0.4–4.2) 1.4 (0.6–3.0) 1.4 (0.5–4.0)
Number of crime-related traumatic events
    0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    1 1.6 (0.7–3.5) 1.3 (0.6–3.1) 2.0 (1.0–3.9) 1.5 (0.8–3.0)
    2 2.3 (0.8–6.8) 2.2 (0.7–7.2) 2.0 (1.0–4.0) 1.7 (0.6–4.3)
    3 or more 3.8 (0.9–16.6) 5.1 (1.8–14.7)** 3.5 (1.5–8.5)** 3.3 (1.6–7.0)**

OR (95% CI): Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

* p < .05

**p < .01

***p < .001